Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380414›Full record

Observational studyBioMed research international2019

Reducing Xerostomia by Comprehensive Protection of Salivary Glands in Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy with Helical Tomotherapy Technique for Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

Feng Teng, Wenjun Fan, Yanrong Luo, Zhongjian Ju, Hanshun Gong, Ruigang Ge, Fang Tong, Xinxin Zhang, Lin Ma

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BioMed research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Feng TengMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Wenjun FanMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Yanrong LuoMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Zhongjian JuMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Hanshun GongMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Ruigang GeMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Fang TongMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.
Xinxin ZhangMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6508-6816
Lin MaMedical School of Chinese PLA, 28 Fuxing Road, Beijing 100853, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4640-3668
China-Japan Friendship Hospital · CNJiangSu Armed Police General Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to analyze the effects of comprehensive protection of bilateral parotid glands (PG-T), contralateral submandibular gland (cSMG), and accessory salivary glands in the oral cavity (OC) by helical tomotherapy for head-and-neck cancer patients.

methodsTotally 175 patients with histologically confirmed head-and-neck cancer treated with helical tomotherapy were recruited. The doses delivered to PG-T, cSMG, and OC were constrained to be as low as possible in treatment planning. The saliva flow rates and xerostomia questionnaire were evaluated. Correlation between xerostomia and other clinical factors were assessed using univariate and multivariate models. The impact of salivary gland dose on locoregional (LR) recurrence was assessed by Cox analysis. ROC curve was used to determine the threshold of mean dose for each gland.

resultsThe median follow-up was 25 (19-36) months. The OC mean dose, PG-T mean dose, cSMG mean dose, age, clinical stage (II and III versus IV), and both unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates were significantly correlated with xerostomia. The OC mean dose, cSMG mean dose, age, and clinical stage were predictors of xerostomia after adjusting PG-T mean dose, and unstimulated and stimulated saliva flow rates. Xerostomia was significantly decreased when the mean doses of PG-T, cSMG, and OC were kept below 29.12Gy, 29.29Gy, and 31.44Gy, respectively. At 18 months after radiation therapy, early LR recurrence rate was only 4%.

conclusionComprehensive protection of salivary glands minimized xerostomia in head-and-neck cancer patients treated by helical tomotherapy, without increasing early LR recurrence risk.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalParotid GlandRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedSalivary GlandsSubmandibular Gland

Identifiers

PMID31380414
PMCPMC6662416
OpenAlexW2957860607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.