Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380392›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2019

Regulation of DNA Double Strand Breaks Processing: Focus on Barriers.

Federica Marini, Chetan C Rawal, Giordano Liberi, Achille Pellicioli

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CRISPR/Cas9 as a Mutagenic Factor.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Practical Approaches for the YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Challenges of CRISPR-Based Gene Editing in Primary T Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Federica MariniDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Chetan C RawalDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Giordano LiberiIstituto di Genetica Molecolare Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza, CNR, Pavia, Italy.
Achille PellicioliDipartimento di Bioscienze, Università degli studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIstituto di Genetica Molecolare · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In all the eukaryotic cells, nucleolytic processing (resection) of a double strand DNA break (DSB) is a key step to channel the repair of the lesion toward the homologous recombination, at the expenses of the non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The coordinated action of several nucleases and helicases generates 3' single strand (ss) DNA, which is covered by RPA and recombination factors. Molecular details of the process have been first dissected in the model organism

Indexed as

DNA:RNA hybridDSB processingHDRNHEJresection barriers

Identifiers

PMID31380392
PMCPMC6646425
OpenAlexW2959666825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.