Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380386›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in nutrition2019

Applications of the Soil, Plant and Rumen Microbiomes in Pastoral Agriculture.

Graeme T Attwood, Steve A Wakelin, Sinead C Leahy, Suzanne Rowe, Shannon Clarke, David F Chapman, Richard Muirhead, Jeanne M E Jacobs

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Storage of soil microbiome for application in sustainable agriculture: prospects and challenges.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Graeme T AttwoodAnimal Science, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Steve A WakelinForage Science, AgResearch, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Sinead C LeahyAnimal Science, AgResearch, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Suzanne RoweAnimal Science, AgResearch, Invermay, New Zealand.
Shannon ClarkeAnimal Science, AgResearch, Invermay, New Zealand.
David F ChapmanDairyNZ, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Richard MuirheadFarm Systems and Environment, AgResearch, Invermay, New Zealand.
Jeanne M E JacobsForage Science, AgResearch, Lincoln, New Zealand.
AgResearch · NZDairyNZ · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The production of dairy, meat, and fiber by ruminant animals relies on the biological processes occurring in soils, forage plants, and the animals' rumens. Each of these components has an associated microbiome, and these have traditionally been viewed as distinct ecosystems. However, these microbiomes operate under similar ecological principles and are connected via water, energy flows, and the carbon and nitrogen nutrient cycles. Here, we summarize the microbiome research that has been done in each of these three environments (soils, forage plants, animals' rumen) and investigate what additional benefits may be possible through understanding the interactions between the various microbiomes. The challenge for future research is to enhance microbiome function by appropriate matching of plant and animal genotypes with the environment to improve the output and environmental sustainability of pastoral agriculture.

Indexed as

ecosystemsfoodgenomicsmetagenomicspasturesoil

Identifiers

PMID31380386
PMCPMC6646666
OpenAlexW2957192772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.