Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380380›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2019

Itch Processing in the Skin.

Martin Schmelz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Skin pain in pediatric atopic dermatitis: mechanisms and management.Current opinion in allergy and clinical immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Itch in dogs and cats.The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Abnormal Intraepidermal Nerve Fiber Density in Disease: A Scoping Review.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. A re-innervatedSkin health and disease · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. The Neuropathic Itch Caused by Pseudorabies Virus.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Martin SchmelzDepartment Experimental Pain Research, CBTM, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.
University Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Itching can result from activity of specialized primary afferent neurons ("pruriceptors") that have been shown to express certain molecular markers such as B-type natriuretic peptide and several members of the Mrgpr-family in rodents. On the other hand, neurons involved in pain processing ("nociceptors") can also provoke itching when the activation site is restricted to an isolated tiny spot within the epidermis. Individuals classified as having sensitive skin report increased itching and pain sensations upon weak external stimuli that are not painful or itchy in the control group. Numerous possible factors could contribute to sensitive skin along the pathway of transduction of the external stimuli into peripheral neuronal signals, followed by neuronal processing, finally resulting in the perception: (a) reduced local protective factors leading to impaired skin barrier function, (b) increased production of excitatory skin mediators, (c) sensitized peripheral neurons, (d) facilitated spinal and central processing, and (e) reduced descending inhibition from the central nervous system. For all of those pathophysiological mechanisms there are clinical examples such as atopic dermatitis (a,b,c), neuropathic itching (c,e), and restless leg syndrome (d,e). However, none of these factors have been directly linked to the occurrence of sensitive skin. Moreover, individuals reporting sensitive skin are heterogeneous and a subpopulation with defined pathophysiology has not yet been identified. Given that the condition is reported in about 50% of women, and thereby includes many healthy individuals, it appears problematic to assign a definitive pathophysiological mechanism to it.

Indexed as

degenerationinflammationitch pathwayneuropathic itchpattern theorysensitization

Identifiers

PMID31380380
PMCPMC6659104
OpenAlexW2956549677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.