Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380056›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2019

Ecosystem services provided by bromeliad plants: A systematic review.

Geraldine Ladino, Fabiola Ospina-Bautista, Jaime Estévez Varón, Lucie Jerabkova, Pavel Kratina

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Floral Traits and Breeding Systems inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Three newPeerJ · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. An ecological perspective on water shedding from leaves.Journal of experimental botany · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Geraldine LadinoDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas Universidad de Caldas Manizales Colombia.
Fabiola Ospina-BautistaDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas Universidad de Caldas Manizales Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2498-1459
Jaime Estévez VarónDepartamento de Ciencias Biológicas Universidad de Caldas Manizales Colombia.
Lucie JerabkovaDepartment of Geography King's College London London UK.
Pavel KratinaSchool of Biological and Chemical Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9144-7937

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The unprecedented loss of biological diversity has negative impacts on ecosystems and the associated benefits which they provide to humans. Bromeliads have high diversity throughout the Neotropics, but they have been negatively affected by habitat loss and fragmentation, climate change, invasive species, and commercialization for ornamental purpose. These plants provide direct benefits to the human society, and they also form microecosystems in which accumulated water and nutrients support the communities of aquatic and terrestrial species, thus maintaining local diversity. We performed a systematic review of the contribution of bromeliads to ecosystem services across their native geographical distribution. We showed that bromeliads provide a range of ecosystem services such as maintenance of biodiversity, community structure, nutrient cycling, and the provisioning of food and water. Moreover, bromeliads can regulate the spread of diseases, and water and carbon cycling, and they have the potential to become important sources of chemical and pharmaceutical products. The majority of this research was performed in Brazil, but future research from other Neotropical countries with a high diversity of bromeliads would fill the current knowledge gaps and increase the generality of these findings. This systematic review identified that future research should focus on provisioning, regulating, and cultural services that have been currently overlooked. This would enhance our understanding of how bromeliad diversity contributes to human welfare, and the negative consequences that loss of bromeliad plants can have on communities of other species and the healthy functioning of the entire ecosystems.

Indexed as

biodiversitybromeliad plantsclimate regulationdiseaseecosystem servicesmicroecosystemsneotropicspharmaceutical potentialwater storage

Identifiers

PMID31380056
PMCPMC6662323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.