Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31380021›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2019

Contingency rules for pathogen competition and antagonism in a genetically based, plant defense hierarchy.

Posy E Busby, Gregory Crutsinger, Matthew Barbour, George Newcombe

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Posy E BusbyBotany and Plant Pathology Department Oregon State University Corvallis Oregon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2837-9820
Gregory CrutsingerDepartment of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia.
Matthew BarbourDepartment of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver British Columbia.
George NewcombeCollege of Natural Resources University of Idaho Moscow Idaho.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant defense against pathogens includes a range of mechanisms, including, but not limited to, genetic resistance, pathogen-antagonizing endophytes, and pathogen competitors. The relative importance of each mechanism can be expressed in a hierarchical view of defense. Several recent studies have shown that pathogen antagonism is inconsistently expressed within the plant defense hierarchy. Our hypothesis is that the hierarchy is governed by contingency rules that determine when and where antagonists reduce plant disease severity.Here, we investigated whether pathogen competition influences pathogen antagonism using

Indexed as

Cladosporiumeriophyid mitefungal leaf endophytegenetic resistanceMelampsoramicrobiomeplant diseaseplant–pathogen interactionPopulus trichocarpaTrichoderma

Identifiers

PMID31380021
PMCPMC6662256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.