ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019
Type III Secretion System of Beneficial Rhizobacteria
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing the Secretion Systems: Genetic Engineering of Super Bioagents for Effective Plant Disease Control.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2026Review
- Type III secretion system diversity in the Pseudomonas fluorescens species complex.The New phytologist · 2026Article
- Beyond pathogenicity: the immunomodulatory role of the type III secretion system in beneficial plant-microbe interactions.Open biology · 2025Review
- Comprehensive analysis of the physiological and molecular responses of phosphate-solubilizing bacteriumFrontiers in plant science · 2025Article
- Article
- Metagenomic insights into jellyfish-associated microbiome dynamics during strobilation.ISME communications · 2024Article
- Secretory molecules from secretion systems fine-tune the host-beneficial bacteria (PGPRs) interaction.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Review
- Microbiota and the plant immune system work together to defend against pathogens.Archives of microbiology · 2023Review
- Article
- Article
- Review
- Bridging the Gap: Type III Secretion Systems in Plant-Beneficial Bacteria.Microorganisms · 2022Article
- Use of beneficial bacterial endophytes: A practical strategy to achieve sustainable agriculture.AIMS microbiology · 2022Review
- NovelFrontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Agronomic efficiency and genome mining analysis of the wheat-biostimulant rhizospheric bacteriumFrontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Insights into the Cultured Bacterial Fraction of Corals.mSystems · 2021Article
- Review
- Metagenomic insights into the taxonomy, function, and dysbiosis of prokaryotic communities in octocorals.Microbiome · 2021Article
- Article
- Characterization of the SPI-1 Type III Secretion System inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plants roots host myriads of microbes, some of which enhance the defense potential of plants by activating a broad-spectrum immune response in leaves, known as induced systemic resistance (ISR). Nevertheless, establishment of this mutualistic interaction requires active suppression of local root immune responses to allow successful colonization. To facilitate host colonization, phytopathogenic bacteria secrete immune-suppressive effectors into host cells via the type III secretion system (T3SS). Previously, we searched the genomes of the ISR-inducing rhizobacteria
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.