Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31379763›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Accurate Quantification and Characterization of Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors.

David Dobnik, Polona Kogovšek, Tjaša Jakomin, Nejc Košir, Magda Tušek Žnidarič, Maja Leskovec, Stephen M Kaminsky, Janet Mostrom, Hyunmi Lee, Maja Ravnikar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. What's new and what's next for gene therapy in Pompe disease?Expert opinion on biological therapy · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Comparison of Media for the Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David DobnikDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Polona KogovšekDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tjaša JakominDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Nejc KoširDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Magda Tušek ŽnidaričDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja LeskovecBIA Separations, Ajdovščina, Slovenia.
Stephen M KaminskyBelfer Gene Therapy Core Facility, Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Janet MostromBelfer Gene Therapy Core Facility, Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Hyunmi LeeBelfer Gene Therapy Core Facility, Department of Genetic Medicine, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, United States.
Maja RavnikarDepartment of Biotechnology and Systems Biology, National Institute of Biology, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the main challenges in the gene therapy viral vector development is to establish an optimized process for its large scale production. This requires optimization for upstream and downstream processes as well as methods that enable the step-by step analytical characterization of the virus, the results of which inform the iterative refinement of production for yield, purity and potency. The biggest problem here is a plethora of viral vector formulations, many of which interfere with analytical techniques. We took adeno-associated virus (AAV) as an example and showed benefits of combined use of molecular methods and transmission electron microscopy (TEM) for viral vectors' characterization and quantification. Results of the analyses showed that droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) performs better than quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR), in terms of robustness and assay variance, and this was especially relevant for partially purified (in-process) samples. Moreover, we demonstrate the importance of sample preparation prior to PCR analysis. We evaluated viral structure, presence of aggregates and impurities with TEM analysis and found that these impacted the differences in viral titers observed by qPCR and ddPCR and could be altered by sample preparation. These results serve as a guide for the establishment of the analytical methods required to provide measures of identity and purity for AAV viral vectors.

Indexed as

AAVabsolute quantificationdigital PCRelectron microscopygene therapyreal-time PCR

Identifiers

PMID31379763
PMCPMC6650692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.