ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019
Remediation of Allophonic Perception and Visual Attention Span in Developmental Dyslexia: A Joint Assay.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improving sentence reading performance in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia by training based on visual attention span.Scientific reports · 2019Trial
- Visual processing is a language-agnostic window into heterogeneity in early reading development.Current biology : CB · 2026Article
- Improving Reading and Eye Movement Control in Readers with Oculomotor and Visuo-Attentional Deficits.Journal of eye movement research · 2025Article
- Design and validation of a rapid visual processing measure for screening reading difficulties in early childhood.Behavior research methods · 2025Article
- Visual attention matters during word recognition: A Bayesian modeling approach.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2025Review
- Factor structure and reliability of the Family Resilience Scale (FRAS): adaptation with Colombian families exposed to stressful events.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Multimodal intervention in 8- to 13-year-old French dyslexic readers: Study protocol for a randomized multicenter controlled crossover trial.BMC pediatrics · 2022Article
- What Is Going on with Visual Attention in Reading and Dyslexia? A Critical Review of Recent Studies.Brain sciences · 2022Review
- Auditory processing disorder in children: the value of a multidisciplinary assessment.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2021Article
- Allophonic perception of VOT contrasts in Spanish children with dyslexia.Brain and behavior · 2021Article
- The Neurological Basis of Developmental Dyslexia and Related Disorders: A Reappraisal of the Temporal Hypothesis, Twenty Years on.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- Principles of Integrated Cognitive Training for Executive Attention: Application to an Instrumental Skill.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Categorical perception of phonemes and visual attention span are cognitive processes that contribute independently to poor reading skills in developmental dyslexia. We here explored whether training programs specifically targeting one or the other process do improve reading performance in dyslexic children. The dyslexic participants were trained using either the RapDys© program designed to improve phonemic perception or the MAEVA© program targeting visual attention span. Each participant was provided the two programs successively for intensive training. Results show specific effects of RapDys© on phonemic discrimination and pseudo-word reading. MAEVA© specifically improved visual attention span and irregular word reading. Phonemic awareness and regular word reading improved after application of both training programs, suggesting similar positive effects of both methods although effects of concomitant phonic training cannot be ruled out (as there was no control group). The overall findings suggest that both categorical perception and visual attention span remediation contribute to reading.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.