Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31379566›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in pharmacology2019

Targeting Synaptic Plasticity in Experimental Models of Alzheimer's Disease.

Dalila Mango, Amira Saidi, Giusy Ylenia Cisale, Marco Feligioni, Massimo Corbo, Robert Nisticò

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
63citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

63 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Gut-brain axis in health and brain disease.Chinese medical journal · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dalila MangoLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, EBRI Rita Levi-Montalcini Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Amira SaidiLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, EBRI Rita Levi-Montalcini Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Giusy Ylenia CisaleDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy.
Marco FeligioniLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, EBRI Rita Levi-Montalcini Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Massimo CorboDepartment of Neurorehabilitation Sciences, Casa Cura Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Robert NisticòLaboratory of Neuropharmacology, EBRI Rita Levi-Montalcini Foundation, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD) of hippocampal synaptic transmission represent the principal experimental models underlying learning and memory. Alterations of synaptic plasticity are observed in several neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Indeed, synaptic dysfunction is an early event in AD, making it an attractive therapeutic target for pharmaceutical intervention. To date, intensive investigations have characterized hippocampal synaptic transmission, LTP, and LTD in

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaselong-term depressionlong-term potentiationpredictive validitysynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID31379566
PMCPMC6646937

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.