ArticleFrontiers in integrative neuroscience2019
The Lateralization of Speech-Brain Coupling Is Differentially Modulated by Intrinsic Auditory and Top-Down Mechanisms.
Article in Frontiers in integrative neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- How auditory rhythm perception shapes speech production: The influence of neural synchronization and rhythmic patterns.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Article
- Neural tracking of prosodic and statistical rhythms jointly supports artificial language learning.iScience · 2026Article
- Article
- Enhanced Time-Locked Decoding for Spoken Words but Not Environmental Sounds in Natural-Like Auditory Conditions.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Theta and Gamma Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation (tACS) Modulate Mandarin Consonant and Lexical Tone Perception.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Cortical and behavioral tracking of rhythm in music: Effects of pitch predictability, enjoyment, and expertise.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025Article
- Speech Prosody Serves Temporal Prediction of Language via Contextual Entrainment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024Article
- Effects of Stimulus Rate and Periodicity on Auditory Cortical Entrainment to Continuous Sounds.eNeuro · 2024Article
- Replication of population-level differences in auditory-motor synchronization ability in a Norwegian-speaking population.Communications psychology · 2023Article
- Neural tracking measures of speech intelligibility: Manipulating intelligibility while keeping acoustics unchanged.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Auditory-motor synchronization varies among individuals and is critically shaped by acoustic features.Communications biology · 2023Article
- Explaining flexible continuous speech comprehension from individual motor rhythms.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Individual theta-band cortical entrainment to speech in quiet predicts word-in-noise comprehension.Cerebral cortex communications · 2023Article
- Examining cortical tracking of the speech envelope in post-stroke aphasia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Sensory temporal sampling in time: an integrated model of the TSF and neural noise hypothesis as an etiological pathway for dyslexia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Dynamic causal modelling of auditory surprise during disconnected consciousness: The role of feedback connectivity.NeuroImage · 2022Article
- Speech-to-Speech Synchronization protocol to classify human participants as high or low auditory-motor synchronizers.STAR protocols · 2022Article
- Preferred auditory temporal processing regimes and auditory-motor synchronization.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2021Article
- Asymmetry of Auditory-Motor Speech Processing is Determined by Language Experience.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Musical Sophistication and Speech Auditory-Motor Coupling: Easy Tests for Quick Answers.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The lateralization of neuronal processing underpinning hearing, speech, language, and music is widely studied, vigorously debated, and still not understood in a satisfactory manner. One set of hypotheses focuses on the temporal structure of perceptual experience and links auditory cortex asymmetries to underlying differences in neural populations with differential temporal sensitivity (e.g., ideas advanced by Zatorre et al. (2002) and Poeppel (2003). The Asymmetric Sampling in Time theory (AST) (Poeppel, 2003), builds on cytoarchitectonic differences between auditory cortices and predicts that modulation frequencies within the range of, roughly, the syllable rate, are more accurately tracked by the right hemisphere. To date, this conjecture is reasonably well supported, since - while there is some heterogeneity in the reported findings - the predicted asymmetrical entrainment has been observed in various experimental protocols. Here, we show that under specific processing demands, the rightward dominance disappears. We propose an enriched and modified version of the asymmetric sampling hypothesis in the context of speech. Recent work (Rimmele et al., 2018b) proposes two different mechanisms to underlie the auditory tracking of the speech envelope: one derived from the intrinsic oscillatory properties of auditory regions; the other induced by top-down signals coming from other non-auditory regions of the brain. We propose that under non-speech listening conditions, the intrinsic auditory mechanism dominates and thus, in line with AST, entrainment is rightward lateralized, as is widely observed. However, (i) depending on individual brain structural/functional differences, and/or (ii) in the context of specific
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.