Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31379483›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Bias Introduced by Multiple Head Coils in MRI Research: An 8 Channel and 32 Channel Coil Comparison.

Jessica L Panman, Yang Yang To, Emma L van der Ende, Jackie M Poos, Lize C Jiskoot, Lieke H H Meeter, Elise G P Dopper, Mark J R J Bouts, Matthias J P van Osch, Serge A R B Rombouts and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Neuroimaging Biomarkers in Addiction.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024
    Article
  15. Empirical assessment of the assumptions of ComBat with diffusion tensor imaging.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024
    Article
  16. IncorporatingFrontiers in neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. DSMRI: Domain Shift Analyzer for Multi-Center MRI Datasets.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jessica L PanmanDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Yang Yang ToDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Emma L van der EndeDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Jackie M PoosDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Lize C JiskootDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Lieke H H MeeterDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Elise G P DopperDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Mark J R J BoutsDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Matthias J P van OschDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Serge A R B RomboutsDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
John C van SwietenDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Jeroen van der GrondDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Janne M PapmaDepartment of Neurology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands.
Anne HafkemeijerDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLLeiden University Medical Center · NLLeiden University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging MRI data in scientific research is increasingly pooled, but the reliability of such studies may be hampered by the use of different hardware elements. This might introduce bias, for example when cross-sectional studies pool data acquired with different head coils, or when longitudinal clinical studies change head coils halfway. In the present study, we aimed to estimate this possible bias introduced by using different head coils to create awareness and to avoid misinterpretation of results. We acquired, with both an 8 channel and 32 channel head coil, T1-weighted, diffusion tensor imaging and resting state fMRI images at 3T MRI (Philips Achieva) with stable acquisition parameters in a large group of cognitively healthy participants (

Indexed as

biasDTIgray matterMRImulticenter studyneuroimagingwhite matter

Identifiers

PMID31379483
PMCPMC6648353
OpenAlexW2961077600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.