Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31379481›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Differential Effects of Sustained Manual Pressure Stimulation According to Site of Action.

Pavel Hok, Jaroslav Opavský, René Labounek, Miroslav Kutín, Martina Šlachtová, Zbyněk Tüdös, Petr Kaňovský, Petr Hluštík

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04824482 (GAIT Recovery in Patients aFter Acute Ischemic STroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04824482 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

GAIT Recovery in Patients aFter Acute Ischemic STroke: A Randomized Comparison of Robot-assisted and Therapist-assisted Gait Training on a Treadmill.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital OlomoucRan2020 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsIschemic StrokeArmsRobot-assisted treadmill gait training (RTGT), Therapist-assisted treadmill gait training (TTGT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pavel HokDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Jaroslav OpavskýDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
René LabounekDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Miroslav KutínKM KINEPRO PLUS s.r.o., Olomouc, Czechia.
Martina ŠlachtováDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Physical Culture, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Zbyněk TüdösDepartment of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Petr KaňovskýDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Petr HluštíkDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czechia.
Palacký University Olomouc · CZUniversity Hospital Olomouc · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sustained pressure stimulation of the body surface has been used in several physiotherapeutic techniques, such as reflex locomotion therapy. Clinical observations of global motor responses and subsequent motor behavioral changes after stimulation in certain sites suggest modulation of central sensorimotor control, however, the neuroanatomical correlates remain undescribed. We hypothesized that different body sites would specifically influence the sensorimotor system during the stimulation. We tested the hypothesis using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in thirty healthy volunteers (mean age 24.2) scanned twice during intermittent manual pressure stimulation, once at the right lateral heel according to reflex locomotion therapy, and once at the right lateral ankle (control site). A flexible modeling approach with finite impulse response basis functions was employed since non-canonical hemodynamic response was expected. Subsequently, a clustering algorithm was used to separate areas with differential timecourses. Stimulation at both sites induced responses throughout the sensorimotor system that could be mostly separated into two anti-correlated subsystems with transient positive or negative signal change and rapid adaptation, although in heel stimulation, insulo-opercular cortices and pons showed sustained activation. In direct voxel-wise comparison, heel stimulation was associated with significantly higher activation levels in the contralateral primary motor cortex and decreased activation in the posterior parietal cortex. Thus, we demonstrate that the manual pressure stimulation affects multiple brain structures involved in motor control and the choice of stimulation site impacts the shape and amplitude of the blood oxygenation level-dependent response. We further discuss the relationship between the affected structures and behavioral changes after reflex locomotion therapy.

Indexed as

brainstemmagnetic resonance imagingneurological rehabilitationphysical stimulationsensorimotor cortex

Identifiers

PMID31379481
PMCPMC6650750
OpenAlexW2959986420

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.