Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31379094›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2019

Understanding the motivations of patients: A co-designed project to understand the factors behind patient engagement.

Tamara L McCarron, Thomas Noseworthy, Karen Moffat, Gloria Wilkinson, Sandra Zelinsky, Deborah White, Derek Hassay, Diane L Lorenzetti, Nancy J Marlett

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Patient and Public Involvement Work With Parents of Children With Life-Limiting Conditions and Bereaved Parents: A Rapid Systematic Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Experiences of people with Long Covid with a digital physiotherapy intervention: A qualitative study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Patient motivation: A concept analysis.Belitung nursing journal · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tamara L McCarronThe Department Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7242-1910
Thomas NoseworthyThe Department Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Karen MoffatUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Gloria WilkinsonUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sandra ZelinskyUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Deborah WhiteFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Doha, Qatar.
Derek HassayHaskayne School of Business, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Diane L LorenzettiThe Department Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Nancy J MarlettThe Department Community Health Sciences, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6417-1894
University of Calgary · CASouth Health Campus · CAUniversity of Calgary in Qatar · QA

Funding

Alberta Health Services
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLarge-scale transformation depends on effective engagement of diverse stakeholders. With the evolution of the role of the 'patient partner' in health-care decision making, understanding the motivations of these individuals is essential to the success of engagement initiatives. This study reports on motivational factors associated with patient engagement in health care.

methodsPatient co-investigators and a researcher co-designed and conducted this study. A survey was administered to patients and family members. Key informant interviews and previous research informed the development of the survey tool. The survey data were analysed using exploratory factor analysis to identify the underlying dimensions in the data. Cronbach's alpha was used to determine reliability.

resultsA total of 1449 individuals participated in the survey. Of these, 543 completed and 427 partially completed the survey (67% complete rate). The mean age of the respondents was 54 years. The majority of participants were female, well-educated, retired, married and lived in an urban centre. Seven motivational factors explained 65% of the total variance. Analysis of internal consistency revealed acceptable reliability for all items. The seven motivations were as follows: Self-fulfillment, Improving Healthcare, Compensation, Influence, Learning New Things, Conditional and Perks.

conclusionThe results of this research describe a sample of patient and family members currently engaged with health systems. We identified seven motivational factors underlying their engagement. A deeper knowledge of volunteer motivations will not only create meaningful engagement opportunities for patients, but also enable health organizations to gain from the experience of these individuals, thereby enhancing quality and sustainability of patient engagement programmes.

Indexed as

MotivationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient ParticipationSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adultco-designhealth care reformmotivationpatient participation

Identifiers

PMID31379094
PMCPMC6737762
OpenAlexW2965769317

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.