Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31379067›Full record

ArticleJournal of the International AIDS Society2019

Assessment of service refinement and its impact on repeat HIV testing by client's access to Australia's universal healthcare system: a retrospective cohort study.

Kathleen E Ryan, Anna L Wilkinson, Jason Asselin, David P Leitinger, Peter Locke, Alisa Pedrana, Margaret Hellard, Mark Stoové

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the International AIDS Society, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kathleen E RyanBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5892-4482
Anna L WilkinsonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Jason AsselinBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
David P LeitingerPRONTO!, Thorne Harbour Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Peter LockePRONTO!, Thorne Harbour Health, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Alisa PedranaBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Margaret HellardBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Mark StoovéBurnet Institute, Melbourne, Vic., Australia.
Burnet Institute · AUCoffs Harbour City Council · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAchieving the virtual elimination of HIV requires equitable access to HIV prevention tools for all priority populations. Restricted access to healthcare means migrants face particular barriers to HIV prevention services. In February 2016, a peer-led rapid HIV testing service for gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (gay and bisexual men, GBM) in Melbourne, Australia, introduced free sexually transmissible infection (STI) testing funded through Medicare (Australia's universal healthcare system). Medicare ineligible migrant clients were required to pay up to $158AUD for STI tests. We determined the uptake of STI testing and assessed the impact on repeat HIV testing among Medicare eligible and ineligible clients.

methodsAll HIV tests conducted between August 2014 and March 2018 were included. We describe client characteristics, STI testing uptake and HIV/STI positivity among Medicare eligible and ineligible clients. Repeat HIV testing, assessed as the percentage of HIV tests with a return test within six months, was compared pre-integration (August 2014-June 2016) and post-integration(July 2016-March 2018) of STI testing using segmented linear regression of monthly aggregate data for Medicare eligible and ineligible clients.

resultsAnalyses included 9134 HIV tests among 4753 individuals. Medicare ineligible clients were younger (p < 0.01), and fewer reported previously testing for HIV (p < 0.01) and high HIV risk sexual behaviours. There was no difference in HIV positivity between the two groups (p = 0.09). STI testing uptake was significantly lower among Medicare ineligible clients (7.6%, 85.3%; p < 0.01). Following STI testing introduction there was an immediate increase in six-month return HIV testing (6.4%; p = 0.02) and a significantly increasing rate of return HIV testing between July 2016 and March 2018 (0.5% per month; p < 0.01) among Medicare eligible clients but no immediate change in return testing (-0.9%; p = 0.7) or the rate of change in return testing between July 2016 and March 2018 (0.1% per month; p = 0.3) among Medicare ineligible clients. In March 2018, six-month return HIV testing was 52.3% and 13.2% among Medicare eligible and ineligible clients respectively. DISCUSSION: Improvements in return HIV testing observed among Medicare eligible clients did not extend to Medicare ineligible clients highlighting the impact of inequitable access to comprehensive sexual healthcare on test-and-treat approaches to HIV prevention.

Indexed as

Universal Health CareAdolescentAdultAIDS SerodiagnosisAustraliaFemaleHealth Risk BehaviorsHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsHumansMaleMass ScreeningRetrospective StudiesSexual BehaviorUnsafe SexYoung Adultcommunity basedHIV infectionsMSMsexually transmitted diseasestestingtransients and migrants delivery of health care

Identifiers

PMID31379067
PMCPMC6680090
OpenAlexW2966839739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.