Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378978›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2019

Social media monitoring on the perceived safety of medication use during pregnancy: A case study from the Netherlands.

Marleen M H J van Gelder, Annemarije Rog, Sebastian J H Bredie, Wietske Kievit, Hedvig Nordeng, Tom H van de Belt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marleen M H J van GelderDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4853-4434
Annemarije RogDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sebastian J H BredieRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6973-7540
Wietske KievitDepartment for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3984-1769
Hedvig NordengPharmacoEpidemiology and Drug Safety Research Group, Department of Pharmacy and PharmaTox Strategic Research Initiative, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6361-2918
Tom H van de BeltRadboud REshape Innovation Center, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5401-8973

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAn increasing number of women trust the Internet for information about medication safety during pregnancy. This study aimed to evaluate the availability and accuracy of social media content on the perceived safety of medication use in pregnancy.

methodsWe performed a systematic search of posts related to medication safety during pregnancy in the Dutch language published on social media, blogs and forums between May 2011 and April 2016 using Coosto, a tool for social media monitoring. The perceived safety in the posts was compared with the Dutch Teratology Information Service (TIS) safety classifications.

resultsWe included 1224 online posts, which described 1441 scenarios about medication safety in pregnancy. A total of 820 (57%) scenarios were in line with the TIS classification. Incorrect perception was higher for prescription medication compared to medication available over-the-counter (60 vs 25%). Furthermore, the safety classification of medications with a TIS classification on strict indication or second-line drugs (93%) and medications with insufficient knowledge on their safety during pregnancy (76%) was more likely to be incorrectly perceived by the public compared to medications with the TIS classification safe (24%).

conclusionsSocial media monitoring may be useful for surveillance of potentially unsafe use of medications in pregnancy. Many social posts related to medication safety during pregnancy provide inaccurate information. As this information may affect women's perceptions and decisions, accurate communication between healthcare providers and pregnant women regarding the benefits and risks of medications is vital.

Indexed as

AdultDecision MakingDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansNetherlandsNonprescription DrugsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrescription DrugsRisk AssessmentSocial MediaNonprescription DrugsPrescription DrugsInternetpharmaceutical preparationspregnancyrisk perceptionsocial media

Identifiers

PMID31378978
PMCPMC6848893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.