ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2020
De novo genome assembly and comparative annotation reveals metabolic versatility in cellulolytic bacteria from cropland and forest soils.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Soil-derived cellulose-degrading bacteria: screening, identification, the optimization of fermentation conditions, and their whole genome sequencing.Frontiers in microbiology · 2024Article
- Structured Framework and Genome Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cellulose, the most abundant polysaccharide in nature, is a rich source of renewable energy and sustains soil nutrients. Among the microorganisms known to degrade cellulose, bacteria are less studied compared to fungi. In the present work, we have investigated the culturable bacteria actively involved in cellulose degradation in forest and crop field soils. Based on clear zone formation and enzyme activity assay, we identified 7 bacterial strains positive for cellulose degradation. Of these, two most efficient strains (Bacillus cereus strains BHU1 and BHU2) were selected for whole genome sequencing, annotation, and information regarding GC content, number of genes, total subsystems, starch, and cellulose degradation pathways. Average nucleotide identity (ANI) showed more than 90% similarity between both the strains (BHU1 and BHU2) and with B. cereus ATCC 14579. Both the strains have genes and enzyme families like endoglucanase and β-glucosidase as evident from whole genome sequence. Cellulase containing gene families (GH5, GH8, GH1), and many other carbohydrate-degrading enzymes, were present in both the bacterial strains. Taken together, the results suggest that the strains were efficient in cellulose degradation, and can be used for energy generation and production of value-added product.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31378834What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.