Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378786›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2019

Global change-driven use of onshore habitat impacts polar bear faecal microbiota.

Sophie E Watson, Heidi C Hauffe, Matthew J Bull, Todd C Atwood, Melissa A McKinney, Massimo Pindo, Sarah E Perkins

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Sophie E WatsonSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, UK. WatsonS2@cardiff.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7789-2567
Heidi C HauffeDepartment of Biodiversity and Molecular Ecology, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, San Michele all' Adige, TN, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3098-8964
Matthew J BullSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8701-0417
Todd C AtwoodUnited States Geological Survey (USGS), University Drive, Anchorage, AK, USA.
Melissa A McKinneyDepartment of Natural Resource Sciences, McGill University, Ste-Anne-de-Bellevue, QC, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8171-7534
Massimo PindoDepartment of Genomics and Biology of Fruit Crops, Research and Innovation Centre, Fondazione Edmund Mach, S. Michele all' Adige, TN, Italy.
Sarah E PerkinsSchool of Biosciences, Cardiff University, The Sir Martin Evans Building, Museum Avenue, Cardiff, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7457-2699
Fondazione Edmund Mach · ITMcGill University · CAUnited States Geological Survey · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The gut microbiota plays a critical role in host health, yet remains poorly studied in wild species. Polar bears (Ursus maritimus), key indicators of Arctic ecosystem health and environmental change, are currently affected by rapid shifts in habitat that may alter gut homeostasis. Declining sea ice has led to a divide in the southern Beaufort Sea polar bear subpopulation such that an increasing proportion of individuals now inhabit onshore coastal regions during the open-water period ('onshore bears') while others continue to exhibit their typical behaviour of remaining on the ice ('offshore bears'). We propose that bears that have altered their habitat selection in response to climate change will exhibit a distinct gut microbiota diversity and composition, which may ultimately have important consequences for their health. Here, we perform the first assessment of abundance and diversity in the faecal microbiota of wild polar bears using 16S rRNA Illumina technology. We find that bacterial diversity is significantly higher in onshore bears compared to offshore bears. The most enriched OTU abundance in onshore bears belonged to the phylum Proteobacteria, while the most depleted OTU abundance within onshore bears was seen in the phylum Firmicutes. We conclude that climate-driven changes in polar bear land use are associated with distinct microbial communities. In doing so, we present the first case of global change mediated alterations in the gut microbiota of a free-roaming wild animal.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeAnimalsAnimals, WildArctic RegionsBacteriaClimate ChangeDNA, BacterialEcosystemFecesIce CoverPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SUrsidaeDNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31378786
PMCPMC6864082
OpenAlexW2966137778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.