Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378756›Full record

ReviewJournal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis2019

Application of Metabolomics to Epidemiological Studies of Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Disease.

Miho Iida, Sei Harada, Toru Takebayashi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05138731 (LC-MS Based Metabolomics Study of Coronary Heart Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05138731 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

LC-MS Based Metabolomics Study of Coronary Heart Disease: Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Metabolites

TypeobservationalSponsorGeneral Hospital of Ningxia Medical UniversityRan2020 to 2023Enrolled821ConditionsBiomarkersArmstreatments according guidelines
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The role of miR-155 in cardiovascular diseases: Potential diagnostic and therapeutic targets.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miho IidaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Sei HaradaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.
Toru TakebayashiDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomics has developed as a powerful tool for investigating the complex pathophysiology underlying atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Many epidemiological studies have applied this technique to accurately and comprehensively assess the effects of environmental factors on health outcomes, which used to be a perpetual challenge. Metabolites are defined as small molecules which are intermediate products of metabolic reactions catalyzed by numerous enzymes occurring within cells. Consequent to both genetic variation and environment, they allow us to explore the gene-environment interactions and to gain a better understanding of multifactorial diseases like cardiovascular disease. This review article highlights the findings of well-known prospective cohort studies around the world that have utilized metabolomics for a wide range of purposes, including biomarker discovery, improving cardiovascular risk prediction and early disease diagnosis, and exploring detailed mechanisms of disease onset and progression. However, technical challenges still exist in applying them clinically. One limitation is due to various analytical platforms that are used based on the judgment of each study; comparative assessments among different platforms need to be conducted in order to correctly interpret and validate each data externally. Secondly, metabolite levels obtained in most high-throughput metabolomics profiling studies are often semiquantitative rather than fully quantitative concentrations, which makes it difficult to compare and combine results among different studies and to determine the levels for practical use. In 2014, the Consortium of Metabolomics Studies was developed, which is expected to take the lead in overcoming these issues.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAtherosclerosisCardiovascular DiseasesEpidemiologic StudiesHumansPrognosisAtherosclerosisCardiovascular diseaseEpidemiologyMetabolomics

Identifiers

PMID31378756
PMCPMC6753246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.