Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378735›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2019

WeCanConnect: Development of a Community-Informed mHealth Tool for People with Disabilities and Cancer.

Susan Magasi, Jennifer Banas, Bruriah Horowitz, Judy Panko Reis, Kimberly The, Tom Wilson, David Victoson

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Architecture Matters-Moving Beyond "Business as Usual": The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Susan Magasi
Jennifer Banas
Bruriah Horowitz
Judy Panko Reis
Kimberly The
Tom Wilson
David Victoson
University of Illinois Chicago · USNortheastern Illinois University · US

Funding

Research Education CoreU54CA202997 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NAYLOR, KEITH BRIAN, TUSSING-HUMPHREYS, LISA · 2015 to 2024
$13.8M
Research Education CoreU54CA203000 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GIACHELLO, AIDA L · 2015 to 2024
$12.4M
The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC)U54CA202995 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA · 2015 to 2024
$9.5M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202995NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202997NCI NIH HHS U54 CA203000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer care for people with disabilities (PWD) is rife with uncertainty and obstacles. Not only do PWD have to contend with cancer and treatment-related sequelae, but also its impact on disabling conditions and functional capacity, as well as a health care system lacking accessibility and disability competence. Peer support can address important needs for emotional and informational support. mHealth tools for smart phones, tablets, or laptops hold promise to deliver such support in an accessible and scalable manner. This concept is unexplored for use among PWD with cancer.

objectivesTo describe a community-based participatory study that 1) identifies consumer-reported support needs and priorities among PWD and cancer and 2) integrates consumer perspectives into the design of an mHealth cancer support tool to address these needs and priorities.

methodsPart 1 is a thematic analysis of semistructured, qualitative interviews with a purposive sample of experts in health and cancer care for PWD (n = 7) and a convenience sample of cancer survivors with preexisting disabilities (n = 9). In part 2, results were integrated to develop an mHealth peer support tool to addresses identified needs.

resultsThemes included 1) barriers across the cancer care continuum, 2) strengths within the disability community, and 3) recommendations for mHealth and peer support. Based on the qualitative findings, we designed a mHealth tool for peer support and information sharing among PWD with cancer.

conclusionConsumer-informed mHealth tools hold great potential to leverage strengths in the disability community to address emotional and informational needs created by a lack of disability competence across the cancer care continuum.

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesHumansNeoplasmsQualitative ResearchTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31378735
PMCPMC8323193
OpenAlexW2966318482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.