Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378727›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2019

Building Cross-Institutional Collaborative Infrastructure and Processes: Early Lessons From the Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.

Melissa A Simon, Marian Fitzgibbon, Christina Ciecierski, Jennifer M Cooper, Erica Martinez, Laura Tom, Jacqueline Kanoon, Joseph Feinglass, Richard Warnecke, Moira Stuart and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Assessing the Coverage of US Cancer Center Primary Catchment Areas.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Architecture Matters-Moving Beyond "Business as Usual": The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2019
    Article
  9. Community-Academic Partnerships to Reduce Cancer Inequities: The ChicagoCHEC Community Engagement Core.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Melissa A Simon
Marian Fitzgibbon
Christina Ciecierski
Jennifer M Cooper
Erica Martinez
Laura Tom
Jacqueline Kanoon
Joseph Feinglass
Richard Warnecke
Moira Stuart
Michael Stern
Lidia Filus
Robert A Winn

Funding

Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Science Institute (NUCATS)UL1TR001422 · NCATS · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI D'AQUILA, RICHARD · 2015 to 2023
$56.8M
Strengthening Stakeholder Engagement in Human Research Protections.UL1TR002003 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI KARNIK, NIRANJAN SUBHASH, MERMELSTEIN, ROBIN J. · 2016 to 2024
$33.7M
Research Education CoreU54CA202997 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI NAYLOR, KEITH BRIAN, TUSSING-HUMPHREYS, LISA · 2015 to 2024
$13.8M
Research Education CoreU54CA203000 · NCI · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI GIACHELLO, AIDA L · 2015 to 2024
$12.4M
The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC)U54CA202995 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY · PI CIECIERSKI, CHRISTINA · 2015 to 2024
$9.5M
The influence of structural violence and individual behavior and health on the gut microbiome and colorectal cancer riskU54MD012523 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI WINN, ROBERT A. · 2017 to 2022
$7.9M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001422NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002003NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202995NCI NIH HHS U54 CA202997NCI NIH HHS U54 CA203000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddressing cancer health disparities requires a multitiered, comprehensive approach. The Chicago Cancer Health Equity Collaborative (ChicagoCHEC) was established as a tri-institutional partnership to advance cancer health equity through scientific discovery, education, and community engagement.

objectivesLarge-scale partnerships rarely document the challenges encountered when establishing processes and operations in the formative years of engagement. We outline selected lessons learned from the first three years of ChicagoCHEC in hopes that future collaborations may be better poised to hit the ground running and create the needed infrastructure for a strong, effective, and sustainable partnership. LESSONS LEARNED: Unifying a diverse group of stakeholders under a shared mission is imperative. A shared governance structure, in which all individuals understand the aims of partnership and can facilitate progress, is crucial for success. Ongoing monitoring of collaborative processes should occur and attention should be given to the optimization of communications.

conclusionsLarge-scale collaborative research and education projects across institutions can be challenging, particularly when establishing a working infrastructure and aligning priorities. However, the benefit of establishing key processes in the early years of the collaborative process can lead to high-quality research output, impact, and a sustainable partnership.

Indexed as

Cultural DiversityInterinstitutional RelationsBiomedical ResearchCancer Care FacilitiesCapacity BuildingChicagoCommunity-Institutional RelationsCommunity ParticipationCooperative BehaviorHealth OccupationsHumansMinority Groups

Identifiers

PMID31378727
PMCPMC6984345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.