Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378605›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2019

Adaptation of Inhibition Mediates Retinal Sensitization.

David B Kastner, Yusuf Ozuysal, Georgia Panagiotakos, Stephen A Baccus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David B KastnerNeuroscience Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Drive W., Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Yusuf OzuysalDepartment of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Drive W., Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Georgia PanagiotakosNeuroscience Program, Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Drive W., Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Stephen A BaccusDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, 299 Campus Drive W., Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: baccus@stanford.edu.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
TRAINING THE NEXT GENERATION OF MENTAL HEALTH RESEARCHERSR25MH060482 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI DANIEL H MATHALON, Susan M. Voglmaier · 2000 to 2026
$5.2M
Function and circuitry of adaptive inhibition in the retinaR01EY022933 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI STEPHEN A BACCUS · 2013 to 2026
$4.8M
Neural coding of interneuron populations in the retinaR01EY025087 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BACCUS, STEPHEN A · 2015 to 2022
$3.1M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022933NEI NIH HHS R01 EY025087NIMH NIH HHS R25 MH060482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In response to a changing sensory environment, sensory systems adjust their neural code for a number of purposes, including an enhanced sensitivity for novel stimuli, prediction of sensory features, and the maintenance of sensitivity. Retinal sensitization is a form of short-term plasticity that elevates local sensitivity following strong, local, visual stimulation and has been shown to create a prediction of the presence of a nearby localized object. The neural mechanism that generates this elevation in sensitivity remains unknown. Using simultaneous intracellular and multielectrode recording in the salamander retina, we show that a decrease in tonic amacrine transmission is necessary for and is correlated spatially and temporally with ganglion cell sensitization. Furthermore, introducing a decrease in amacrine transmission is sufficient to sensitize nearby ganglion cells. A computational model accounting for adaptive dynamics and nonlinear pathways confirms a decrease in steady inhibitory transmission can cause sensitization. Adaptation of inhibition enhances the sensitivity to the sensory feature conveyed by an inhibitory pathway, creating a prediction of future input.

Indexed as

Neural InhibitionAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmbystomaAnimalsFemaleInterneuronsLarvaMalePhotic StimulationRetinaVisual Pathwaysadaptationcomputational modelinformation processinginhibitionneural circuitvisual system

Identifiers

PMID31378605
PMCPMC6738560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.