Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378395›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019

Ursodeoxycholic acid versus placebo in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (PITCHES): a randomised controlled trial.

Lucy C Chappell, Jennifer L Bell, Anne Smith, Louise Linsell, Edmund Juszczak, Peter H Dixon, Jenny Chambers, Rachael Hunter, Jon Dorling, Catherine Williamson and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 125 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
125citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

125 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 279 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FIGO guideline on liver disease and pregnancy.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Liver Conditions Specific to Pregnancy: Optimizing Management and Outcomes.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

65 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK. Electronic address: lucy.chappell@kcl.ac.uk.
Jennifer L BellNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Anne SmithNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Louise LinsellNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Edmund JuszczakNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit Clinical Trials Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Peter H DixonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jenny ChambersICP Support, Sutton Coldfield, UK.
Rachael HunterResearch Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK.
Jon DorlingDivision of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, IWK Health Centre, Halifax, NS, Canada.
Catherine WilliamsonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, School of Life Course Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jim G ThorntonDivision of Child Health, Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
PITCHES study group
University of Oxford · GBKing's College London · GBIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAUniversity College London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health PB-PG-0107-12037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, characterised by maternal pruritus and increased serum bile acid concentrations, is associated with increased rates of stillbirth, preterm birth, and neonatal unit admission. Ursodeoxycholic acid is widely used as a treatment without an adequate evidence base. We aimed to evaluate whether ursodeoxycholic acid reduces adverse perinatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy.

methodsWe did a double-blind, multicentre, randomised placebo-controlled trial at 33 hospital maternity units in England and Wales. We recruited women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy, who were aged 18 years or older and with a gestational age between 20 weeks and 40 weeks and 6 days, with a singleton or twin pregnancy and no known lethal fetal anomaly. Participants were randomly assigned 1:1 to ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo, given as two oral tablets a day at an equivalent dose of 500 mg twice a day. The dose could be increased or decreased at the clinician's discretion, to a maximum of four tablets and a minimum of one tablet a day. We recommended that treatment should be continued from enrolment until the infant's birth. The primary outcome was a composite of perinatal death (in-utero fetal death after randomisation or known neonatal death up to 7 days after birth), preterm delivery (<37 weeks' gestation), or neonatal unit admission for at least 4 h (from birth until hospital discharge). Each infant was counted once within this composite. All analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. The trial was prospectively registered with the ISRCTN registry, number 91918806.

findingsBetween Dec 23, 2015, and Aug 7, 2018, 605 women were enrolled and randomly allocated to receive ursodeoxycholic acid (n=305) or placebo (n=300). The primary outcome analysis included 304 women and 322 infants in the ursodeoxycholic acid group, and 300 women and 318 infants in the placebo group (consent to use data was withdrawn for 1 woman and 2 infants). The primary composite outcome occurred in 74 (23%) of 322 infants in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and 85 (27%) of 318 infants in the placebo group (adjusted risk ratio 0·85 [95% CI 0·62-1·15]). Two serious adverse events were reported in the ursodeoxycholic acid group and six serious adverse events were reported in the placebo group; no serious adverse events were regarded as being related to treatment.

interpretationTreatment with ursodeoxycholic acid does not reduce adverse perinatal outcomes in women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy. Therefore, its routine use for this condition should be reconsidered.

fundingNational Institute for Health Research Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation Programme.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAlanine TransaminaseBile Acids and SaltsBiomarkersCholagogues and CholereticsCholestasis, IntrahepaticDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLive BirthPerinatal DeathPregnancyAlanine TransaminaseBile Acids and SaltsBiomarkersCholagogues and CholereticsUrsodeoxycholic Acid

Identifiers

PMID31378395
PMCPMC6739598
OpenAlexW2966395542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.