Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31378394›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019

Oral antihypertensive regimens (nifedipine retard, labetalol, and methyldopa) for management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Thomas Easterling, Shuchita Mundle, Hillary Bracken, Seema Parvekar, Sulabha Mool, Laura A Magee, Peter von Dadelszen, Tara Shochet, Beverly Winikoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01912677 (Oral Antihypertensive Regimens for Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01912677 phase4completednot on this map

Oral Antihypertensive Regimens for Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGynuity Health ProjectsRan2015 to 2017Enrolled894ConditionsHypertension in Pregnancy, PreeclampsiaArmsNifedipine, Labetalol, Methyldopa
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Calcium Channel Blockers in Acute Care: The Links and Missing Links Between Hemodynamic Effects and Outcome Evidence.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021
    Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Overlap of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-eclampsia: A Scoping Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. CALHM5 deficiency alleviates aortic aneurysm by regulating smooth muscle calcium homeostasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Current Understanding on Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy.International journal of general medicine · 2026
    Review
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thomas EasterlingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Shuchita MundleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Government Medical College, Nagpur, India.
Hillary BrackenGynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: hbracken@gynuity.org.
Seema ParvekarDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Daga Memorial Women's Government Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Sulabha MoolDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Daga Memorial Women's Government Hospital, Nagpur, India.
Laura A MageeDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Peter von DadelszenDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, London, UK.
Tara ShochetGynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA.
Beverly WinikoffGynuity Health Projects, New York, NY, USA.
Government Medical College · INGynuity Health Projects · USKing's College London · GBUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertension is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, complicating one in ten pregnancies. Treatment of severely increased blood pressure is widely recommended to reduce the risk for maternal complications. Regimens for the acute treatment of severe hypertension typically include intravenous medications. Although effective, these drugs require venous access and careful fetal monitoring and might not be feasible in busy or low-resource environments. We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of three oral drugs, labetalol, nifedipine retard, and methyldopa for the management of severe hypertension in pregnancy.

methodsIn this multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we compared these oral antihypertensives in two public hospitals in Nagpur, India. Pregnant women were eligible for the trial if they were aged at least 18 years; they were pregnant with fetuses that had reached a gestational age of at least 28 weeks; they required pharmacological blood pressure control for severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg); and were able to swallow oral medications. Women were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg oral nifedipine, 200 mg oral labetalol (hourly, in both of which the dose could be escalated if hypertension was maintained), or 1000 mg methyldopa (a single dose, without dose escalation). Masking of participants, study investigators, and care providers to group allocation was not possible because of different escalation protocols in the study groups. The primary outcome was blood pressure control (defined as 120-150 mm Hg systolic blood pressure and 70-100 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) within 6 h with no adverse outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01912677, and the Clinical Trial Registry, India, number ctri/2013/08/003866.

findingsBetween April 1, 2015, and Aug 21, 2017, we screened 2307 women for their inclusion in the study. We excluded 1413 (61%) women who were ineligible, declined to participate, had impending eclampsia, were in active labour, or had a combination of these factors. 11 (4%) women in the nifedipine group, ten (3%) women in the labetalol group, and 11 (4%) women in the methyldopa group were ineligible for treatment (because they had only one qualifying blood pressure measurement) or had treatment stopped (because of delivery or transfer elsewhere). 894 (39%) women were randomly assigned to a treatment group and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 298 (33%) women were assigned to receive nifedipine, 295 (33%) women were assigned to receive labetalol, and 301 (33%) women were assigned to receive methyldopa. The primary outcome was significantly more common in women in the nifedipine group than in those in the methyldopa group (249 [84%] women vs 230 [76%] women; p=0·03). However, the primary outcome did not differ between the nifedipine and labetalol groups (249 [84%] women vs 228 [77%] women; p=0·05) or the labetalol and methyldopa groups (p=0·80). Seven serious adverse events (1% of births) were reported during the study: one (<1%) woman in the labetalol group had an intrapartum seizure and six (1%) neonates (one [<1%] neonate in the nifedipine group, two [1%] neonates in the labetalol group, and three [1%] neonates in the methyldopa group) were stillborn. No birth had more than one adverse event.

interpretationAll oral antihypertensives reduced blood pressure to the reference range in most women. As single drugs, nifedipine retard use resulted in a greater frequency of primary outcome attainment than labetalol or methyldopa use. All three oral drugs-methyldopa, nifedipine, and labetalol-are viable initial options for treating severe hypertension in low-resource settings.

fundingPREEMPT (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; grantee of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedIndiaInfant, NewbornLabetalolMethyldopaNifedipinePregnancyPregnancy OutcomeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAntihypertensive AgentsLabetalolMethyldopaNifedipine

Identifiers

PMID31378394
PMCPMC6857437
OpenAlexW2966184781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.