Trial reportLancet (London, England)2019
Oral antihypertensive regimens (nifedipine retard, labetalol, and methyldopa) for management of severe hypertension in pregnancy: an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01912677 (Oral Antihypertensive Regimens for Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy), which is not on this map. Cited by 62 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Oral Antihypertensive Regimens for Management of Hypertension in Pregnancy
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 171 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of pharmacological agents for management of post-partum hypertension: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Journal of human hypertension · 2026Pooled it
- Antihypertensive therapy for pregnancy hypertension and implications for fetal and neonatal heart rate monitoring: A systematic review of randomized trials and observational studies.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Pooled it
- The Risk for Neonatal Hypoglycemia and Bradycardia after Beta-Blocker Use during Pregnancy or Lactation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Pooled it
- Impact of Chronic Hypertension and Antihypertensive Treatment on Adverse Perinatal Outcomes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Calcium Channel Blockers in Acute Care: The Links and Missing Links Between Hemodynamic Effects and Outcome Evidence.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2021Pooled it
- School Performance After Maintenance Tocolysis With Nifedipine for Threatened Preterm Birth: 12-Year Follow-Up of the APOSTEL 2 Trial.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Trial
- Effectiveness of nifedipine, labetalol, and hydralazine as emergency antihypertension in severe preeclampsia: a randomized control trial.F1000Research · 2022Trial
- A unified framework and benchmark for generalizable biomedical knowledge extraction and applications with large language models.Cell reports. Medicine · 2026Article
- Labetalol, Nifedipine, and Methyldopa for the Management of Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy in Iran: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Overlap of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus and Pre-eclampsia: A Scoping Review.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2026Review
- A comparison of the safety of oral labetalol versus nifedipine to manage hypertension in pregnancy in Australia: a target trial emulation.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Review
- CALHM5 deficiency alleviates aortic aneurysm by regulating smooth muscle calcium homeostasis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Identifying mitochondrial genes and potential biological functions in pre-eclampsia: bioinformatics and experimental insights.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Article
- Comparative maternal-fetal outcomes associated with different antihypertensive treatment strategies in preeclampsia: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- The Japanese Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of elevated blood pressure and hypertension 2025 (JSH2025).Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
- Oral Immediate-Release Nifedipine Versus Intravenous Hydralazine for Controlling Severe Hypertension in Pregnancy: A Double-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial.International journal of medical science and dental health · 2026Article
- Resistant Hypertension: Integration of Novel Agents and Interventional Approaches in Clinical Practice.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Current Understanding on Hypertensive Disorders in Pregnancy.International journal of general medicine · 2026Review
- Effects of early vs. late administration of labetalol on maternal cerebral perfusion and fetal growth in severe pre-eclampsia.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHypertension is the most common medical disorder in pregnancy, complicating one in ten pregnancies. Treatment of severely increased blood pressure is widely recommended to reduce the risk for maternal complications. Regimens for the acute treatment of severe hypertension typically include intravenous medications. Although effective, these drugs require venous access and careful fetal monitoring and might not be feasible in busy or low-resource environments. We therefore aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of three oral drugs, labetalol, nifedipine retard, and methyldopa for the management of severe hypertension in pregnancy.
methodsIn this multicentre, parallel-group, open-label, randomised controlled trial, we compared these oral antihypertensives in two public hospitals in Nagpur, India. Pregnant women were eligible for the trial if they were aged at least 18 years; they were pregnant with fetuses that had reached a gestational age of at least 28 weeks; they required pharmacological blood pressure control for severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mm Hg); and were able to swallow oral medications. Women were randomly assigned to receive 10 mg oral nifedipine, 200 mg oral labetalol (hourly, in both of which the dose could be escalated if hypertension was maintained), or 1000 mg methyldopa (a single dose, without dose escalation). Masking of participants, study investigators, and care providers to group allocation was not possible because of different escalation protocols in the study groups. The primary outcome was blood pressure control (defined as 120-150 mm Hg systolic blood pressure and 70-100 mm Hg diastolic blood pressure) within 6 h with no adverse outcomes. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01912677, and the Clinical Trial Registry, India, number ctri/2013/08/003866.
findingsBetween April 1, 2015, and Aug 21, 2017, we screened 2307 women for their inclusion in the study. We excluded 1413 (61%) women who were ineligible, declined to participate, had impending eclampsia, were in active labour, or had a combination of these factors. 11 (4%) women in the nifedipine group, ten (3%) women in the labetalol group, and 11 (4%) women in the methyldopa group were ineligible for treatment (because they had only one qualifying blood pressure measurement) or had treatment stopped (because of delivery or transfer elsewhere). 894 (39%) women were randomly assigned to a treatment group and were included in the intention-to-treat analysis: 298 (33%) women were assigned to receive nifedipine, 295 (33%) women were assigned to receive labetalol, and 301 (33%) women were assigned to receive methyldopa. The primary outcome was significantly more common in women in the nifedipine group than in those in the methyldopa group (249 [84%] women vs 230 [76%] women; p=0·03). However, the primary outcome did not differ between the nifedipine and labetalol groups (249 [84%] women vs 228 [77%] women; p=0·05) or the labetalol and methyldopa groups (p=0·80). Seven serious adverse events (1% of births) were reported during the study: one (<1%) woman in the labetalol group had an intrapartum seizure and six (1%) neonates (one [<1%] neonate in the nifedipine group, two [1%] neonates in the labetalol group, and three [1%] neonates in the methyldopa group) were stillborn. No birth had more than one adverse event.
interpretationAll oral antihypertensives reduced blood pressure to the reference range in most women. As single drugs, nifedipine retard use resulted in a greater frequency of primary outcome attainment than labetalol or methyldopa use. All three oral drugs-methyldopa, nifedipine, and labetalol-are viable initial options for treating severe hypertension in low-resource settings.
fundingPREEMPT (University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; grantee of Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.