ArticleThe Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy2019
Development of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index.
Article in The Journal of orthopaedic and sports physical therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04270565 (Gait-Training Using Wearable Sensors for Runners With Exercise-Related Lower Leg Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Gait-Training Using Wearable Sensors for Runners With Exercise-Related Lower Leg Pain
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and psychometric evaluation of the Arabic version of the University of Wisconsin running injury and recovery index: a reliability and validity study.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Exercise, radial pressure waves, and photobiomodulation for management of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy in runners: a three-arm non-blinded randomised control trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2025Article
- Is the addition of running retraining to best standard care beneficial in runners with medial tibial stress syndrome? Protocol for a randomised controlled trial.Journal of foot and ankle research · 2024Article
- Cross cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Persian version of the university of Wisconsin running injury and recovery index.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Article
- "Biofeedback-based return to sport": individualization through objective assessments.Frontiers in physiology · 2023Article
- Signs of Nervous System Sensitization in Female Runners with Chronic Patellofemoral Pain.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2023Article
- A machine learning approach to identify risk factors for running-related injuries: study protocol for a prospective longitudinal cohort trial.BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Injury-related psychological distress and the association with perceived running ability in injured runners.Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Sensor-based gait training to reduce contact time for runners with exercise-related lower leg pain: a randomised controlled trial.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2022Article
- Research protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of shockwave therapy, photobiomodulation and physical therapy in the management of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy in runners: a randomised control trial with elective cross-over design.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRunners experience a high proportion of overuse injuries, with extended recovery periods involving a gradual, progressive return to preinjury status. A running-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) measure does not exist, and a questionnaire assessing critical elements of runners' recovery processes may have excellent psychometric properties.
objectivesTo develop a valid, reliable, and responsive evaluative PRO measure to assess longitudinal change in running ability after running-related injury (RRI) for clinical practice and research applications.
methodsSelf-identified runners and selected experts participated in an iterative, 6-step development process of the University of Wisconsin Running Injury and Recovery Index (UWRI) in this longitudinal clinical measurement study. Content-related validity was assessed using open comments. Reproducibility was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and standard error of measurement (SEM). An anchor-based construct validity assessment measured the association between the change in UWRI score and global rating of change (GROC). Responsiveness assessments included floor and ceiling effects.
resultsThe 9-item UWRI assesses running ability following an RRI, with the maximum score of 36 indicating a return to preinjury running ability. The UWRI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (
conclusionThe UWRI is a reliable PRO measure and is responsive to changes in running function following an RRI, with minimal administrative burden. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapy, level 2c.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.