ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2019
Reconstruction of compressively sampled MR images based on a local shrinkage thresholding algorithm with curvelet transform.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To reduce the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data acquisition time and improve the MR image reconstruction performance, reconstruction algorithms based on the iterative shrinkage thresholding algorithm (ISTA) are widely used. However, these traditional algorithms use global threshold shrinkage, which is not efficient. In this paper, a novel algorithm based on local threshold shrinkage, which is called the local shrinkage thresholding algorithm (LSTA), was proposed. The LSTA can shrink differently for different elements from the residual matrix to adjust the shrinkage speed for each element of the image during the iterative process. Then, by taking advantage of the sparser characteristics of the curvelet transform, the LSTA combined with the curvelet transform (CLSTA) can make the construction process more efficient. Finally, compared with ISTA, the generalized thresholding iterative algorithm (GTIA) and the fast iterative shrinkage threshold algorithm (FISTA), when analysing human (brain and cervical) MR images, a conclusion can be drawn that the proposed method has better reconstruction performance in terms of the mean square error (MSE), the peak signal to noise ratio (PNSR), the structural similarity index measure (SSIM), the normalized mutual information (NMI), the transferred edge information (TEI) and the number of iterations. The proposed method can better maintain the detailed information of the reconstructed images and effectively decrease the blurring of the images edges. Graphical abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31377962What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.