Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31377860›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2020

Maxillofacial injuries in severely injured patients after road traffic accidents-a retrospective evaluation of the TraumaRegister DGU® 1993-2014.

Sebastian Pietzka, Peer W Kämmerer, Silke Pietzka, Alexander Schramm, Lorenz Lampl, Rolf Lefering, Dan Bieler, Martin Kulla

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sebastian PietzkaDepartment of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Peer W KämmererDepartment of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial-Surgery, University Medical Centre Mainz, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1671-3764
Silke PietzkaDepartment of Dental Care and Centre for Dental Specialties, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Alexander SchrammDepartment of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial-Surgery, German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Lorenz LamplDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Rolf LeferingInstitute for Research in Operative Medicine (IFOM), Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany.
Dan BielerDepartment of Trauma Surgery and Orthopaedics, Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery and Burn Medicine, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Ruebenacher Strasse 170, 56072, Koblenz, Germany.
Martin KullaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine Section, HEMS Christoph 22, German Armed Forces Hospital of Ulm, Oberer Eselsberg 40, 89081, Ulm, Germany. martin.kulla@uni-ulm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7454-0876
University Hospital Ulm · DEBundeswehrzentralkrankenhaus Koblenz · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEUniversität Ulm · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIt was the aim of the study to analyse the prevalence of maxillofacial trauma (MFT) in severely injured patients after road traffic accidence (RTA) and to investigate associated factors. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn a retrospective study, data from patients after RTA by the TraumaRegister DGU® from 1993 to 2014 were evaluated for demographical and injury characteristics. The predictor variable was mechanism of injury and the outcome variables were type of injury, severity and hospital resources utilization.

resultsDuring the investigation period, n = 62,196 patients were enclosed with a prevalence of maxillofacial injuries of 20.3% (MFT positive). The injury severity score of MFT-positive patients was higher than in the MTF-negative subgroup (27 ± 12.8 vs. 23.0 ± 12.7). If MFT positive, 39.8% show minor, 37.1% moderate, 21.5% serious and 1.6% severe maxillofacial injuries. Injuries of the midface occurred in 60.3% of MTF-positive patients. A relevant blood loss (> 20% of total blood volume) occurred in 1.9%. MFT-positive patients had a higher coincidence with cervical spine fractures (11.3% vs. 7.8%) and traumatic brain injuries (62.6% vs. 34.8%) than MFT-negative patients. There was a noticeable decrease in the incidence of facial injuries in car/truck drivers during the study period.

conclusionsEvery 5th patient after RTA shows a MFT and the whole trauma team must be aware that this indicates a high prevalence of traumatic brain and cervical spine injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Even if sole injuries of the face are seldom life threatening, maxillofacial expertise in interdisciplinary trauma centres is strongly recommended.

Indexed as

Accidents, TrafficMaxillofacial InjuriesRegistriesHumansIncidenceMalePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesEpidemiologyMaxillofacial injuryRoad traffic accidentTrauma

Identifiers

PMID31377860
PMCPMC7223802
OpenAlexW2965373715

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.