Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries: dealing with pears and apples.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Coronary Endothelial Dysfunction and Vasomotor Dysregulation in Myocardial Bridging.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
   Review
2. Evaluation of the Relationship Between Aortic Stiffness and Elasticity and Left Ventricular Functional Parameters in Patients with ANOCA Using CCTA.International journal of general medicine · 2025
   Article
3. Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes of Patients With Myocardia Infarction (MI) With Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries and MI With Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cureus · 2023
   Review
4. Precision medicine versus standard of care for patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA): rationale and design of the multicentre, randomised PROMISE trial.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
   Article
5. Editorial: MINOCA: Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, Clinical Management and Evolution Towards Precision Medicine.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022
   Article
6. Why the Term MINOCA Does Not Provide Conceptual Clarity for Actionable Decision-Making in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
   Review
7. Impact of admission hyperglycemia on short and long-term prognosis in acute myocardial infarction: MINOCA versus MIOCA.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2021
   Observational
8. Interplay Between Myocardial Bridging and Coronary Spasm in Patients With Myocardial Ischemia and Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: Pathogenic and Prognostic Implications.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021
   Article
9. The Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Myocardial Infarction and Non-obstructive Coronary Arteries.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021
   Review
10. Inhibition of JAK2/STAT3/SOCS3 signaling attenuates atherosclerosis in rabbit.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2020
    Article
11. Myocardial and Microvascular Injury Due to Coronavirus Disease 2019.European cardiology · 2020
    Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries as compared with myocardial infarction and obstructive coronary disease: outcomes in a Medicare population.2020

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as