ArticleBMJ open2019
Transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease in transition to adulthood: protocol for a mixed-method process evaluation study (the STEPSTONES project).
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06823622 (Evaluation of the Digital Delivery of Person-centered Transitional Care to Empower Adolescents With Chronic Childhood-onset Diseases), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Digital Delivery of Person-centered Transitional Care to Empower Adolescents With Chronic Childhood-onset Diseases: The Digi-STEPSTONES Study
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Discontinuity of Cardiac Follow-Up in Young People With Congenital Heart Disease Transitioning to Adulthood: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2021Pooled it
- Implementation fidelity of a transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease: the STEPSTONES project.BMC health services research · 2022Trial
- Mechanisms of impact and experiences of a person-centred transition programme for adolescents with CHD: the Stepstones project.BMC health services research · 2021Trial
- Feasibility of Repeated Patient-Reported Outcome Collection and Trial Design Implications for Structured Transition Care in Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease: A Single-Center Pilot Randomized Controlled Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Transition to Adult Care in Childhood-Onset Epilepsy: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a Japanese Children's Hospital.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
- Realist evaluation of Belgian pilot projects for paediatric transmural care: protocol for a mixed methods study.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Evaluation of person-centred care within the Stepstones transition program for adolescents with congenital heart disease - a document analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Development of quality indicators of transfer and transition in adolescents and young adults with congenital heart disease.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- Strategies to Aid Successful Transition of Adolescents with Congenital Heart Disease: A Systematic Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Programmes to support paediatric to adult healthcare transitions for youth with complex care needs and their families: A scoping review.Child: care, health and development · 2022Article
- Article
- When face-to-face interviews are not possible: tips and tricks for video, telephone, online chat, and email interviews in qualitative research.European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2021Article
- Article
- Factors affecting adolescents' participation in randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of healthcare interventions: the case of the STEPSTONES project.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Article
- Article
- Process evaluation of complex cardiovascular interventions: How to interpret the results of my trial?European journal of cardiovascular nursing · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionToday, the majority of young persons living with chronic conditions in high-income countries survive into adulthood and will need life-long medical follow-up. Therefore, transition programmes have been developed to facilitate transfer to adult care, and to support self-management and independence during adulthood. The Swedish Transition Effects Project Supporting Teenagers with chrONic mEdical conditionS (STEPSTONES) project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a person-centred transition programme for empowering adolescents with congenital heart disease in transition to adulthood. To understand how the transition programme causes change and how outcomes are created, process evaluation is imperative to assess implementation, context and mechanisms of impact. This protocol aims to describe the process evaluation of the STEPSTONES transition programme. METHODS AND
designMedical Research Council guidance for process evaluation of complex interventions will be the guiding framework for this mixed-method study. The combination of qualitative and quantitative data will capture different aspects of programme delivery. The sample will consist of participants in the STEPSTONES randomised controlled trial (RCT), persons implementing the programme and healthcare professionals. Quantitative data will consist of protocols and routine monitoring documents from the RCT, data collected from patient registries and sociodemographic data to assess the implementation of the intervention. This data will be analysed with quantitative content analysis, along with descriptive and inferential statistics. Qualitative data will consist of participatory observations, logbooks and interviews with persons implementing the programme, participants and healthcare professionals. Analyses will be performed using qualitative content analysis to investigate mechanism of impact, context and delivery. Quantitative and qualitative data will be integrated in the final stage by using a triangulation protocol according to mixed-method guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is approved by the Regional Ethical Review Board in Gothenburg, Sweden. Results will be presented in open access, peer-reviewed journals and at international scientific conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.