ArticleJournal of neuroscience methods2019
Measurement-oriented deep-learning workflow for improved segmentation of myelin and axons in high-resolution images of human cerebral white matter.
Article in Journal of neuroscience methods, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding the MyelinASN neuro · 2025Article
- Automated pipeline for nerve fiber selection and g-ratio calculation in optical microscopy: exploring staining protocol variations.Frontiers in neuroanatomy · 2023Article
- A Comparative Study of Natural Language Processing Algorithms Based on Cities Changing Diabetes Vulnerability Data.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Rapid, automated nerve histomorphometry through open-source artificial intelligence.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- High-throughput segmentation of unmyelinated axons by deep learning.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- A simple and robust method for automating analysis of naïve and regenerating peripheral nerves.PloS one · 2021Article
- Deep learning methods and applications in neuroimaging.Journal of neuroscience methods · 2020Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStandard segmentation of high-contrast electron micrographs (EM) identifies myelin accurately but does not translate easily into measurements of individual axons and their myelin, even in cross-sections of parallel fibers. We describe automated segmentation and measurement of each myelinated axon and its sheath in EMs of arbitrarily oriented human white matter from autopsies. NEW
methodsPreliminary segmentation of myelin, axons and background by machine learning, using selected filters, precedes automated correction of systematic errors. Final segmentation is done by a deep neural network (DNN). Automated measurement of each putative fiber rejects measures encountering pre-defined artifacts and excludes fibers failing to satisfy pre-defined conditions.
resultsImproved segmentation of three sets of 30 annotated images each (two sets from human prefrontal white matter and one from human optic nerve) is achieved with a DNN trained only with a subset of the first set from prefrontal white matter. Total number of myelinated axons identified by the DNN differed from expert segmentation by 0.2%, 2.9%, and -5.1%, respectively. G-ratios differed by 2.96%, 0.74% and 2.83%. Intraclass correlation coefficients between DNN and annotated segmentation were mostly >0.9, indicating nearly interchangeable performance. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD(S): Measurement-oriented studies of arbitrarily oriented fibers from central white matter are rare. Published methods are typically applied to cross-sections of fascicles and measure aggregated areas of myelin sheaths and axons, allowing estimation only of average g-ratio.
conclusionsAutomated segmentation and measurement of axons and myelin is complex. We report a feasible approach that has so far proven comparable to manual segmentation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.