ArticleThe Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine2019
Acceptability of Adolescent Social and Behavioral Health Screening in the Emergency Department.
Article in The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electronic Screening for Adolescent Risk Behaviors in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2022Trial
- Acceptability of screening for substance use among children at Ugandan health facilities.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
- A Survey of Adolescent and Caregiver Perceptions of Substance Use Screening in Pediatric Emergency Departments.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2025Article
- Substance Use among Youth Presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department.Journal of medical toxicology : official journal of the American College of Medical Toxicology · 2025Article
- Emergency Department Screening and Interventions for Adolescents With Substance Use: A Narrative Review.The Journal of emergency medicine · 2024Review
- Pediatric Emergency Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Behaviors Regarding Confidential Adolescent Care.Pediatric emergency care · 2024Article
- Firearm screening in pediatric patients.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Parental Preferences for Mental Health Screening of Youths From a Multinational Survey.JAMA network open · 2023Article
- 2021 SAEM Consensus Conference Proceedings: Research Priorities for Implementing Emergency Department Screening for Social Risks and Needs.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2023Review
- Robust Parental Preferences in Mental Health Screening in Youth From a Multinational Online Survey.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023Article
- Addressing adolescent substance use in an urban pediatric federally qualified health center.Journal of substance abuse treatment · 2022Article
- Barriers to Universal Suicide Risk Screening for Youth in the Emergency Department.Pediatric emergency care · 2022Review
- Targeted HIV screening in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Review
- Confidential Screening for Sex Trafficking Among Minors in a Pediatric Emergency Department.Pediatrics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThe American Academy of Pediatrics recommends routine screening for social and behavioral health risks (SBHR) in adolescents. Because adolescents who seek care in emergency departments (EDs) may have riskier behaviors than adolescents who access primary care, the ED may be a strategic additional setting for screening. We sought to identify acceptable domains for comprehensive SBHR screening in a pediatric ED.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey to assess adolescent and caregiver acceptance of ED-based SBHR screening across multiple domains. Logistic regression was performed to identify factors associated with screening acceptance. McNemar's test was used to assess agreement within patient/caregiver dyads across domains.
resultsAmong our 516 study participants (347 adolescents and 169 caregivers), those who indicated that they "agree" or "strongly agree" that ED-based screening should be conducted were classified as finding screening acceptable. Acceptability rates ranged from 45.0% (firearm access) to 77.5% (suicidality) among adolescents and 61.5% (firearm access) to 84.0% (substance use) among caregivers. After adjusting for gender, race/ethnicity, and insurance status, adolescents were less accepting than caregivers of screening for: substance use (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: .51; .31, .83; p < .01); violence (aOR: .63; .41, .97; p = .04); depression (aOR: .65; .42, .99; p = .04); human trafficking (aOR: .58; .39, .86; p < .01); and access to firearms (aOR: .47; .32, .70; p < .01). Shared agreement within adolescent/caregiver dyads ranged from 25.2% to 67.1%.
conclusionsA majority of adolescents and caregivers agree that ED-based SBHR screening should be conducted across most domains. Caregivers generally had higher rates of screening acceptance than adolescents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.