Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31377160›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

Lumpectomy Plus Hormone or Radiation Therapy Alone for Women Aged 70 Years or Older With Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Stage Breast Cancer in the Modern Era: An Analysis of the National Cancer Database.

Samantha M Buszek, Heather Y Lin, Isabelle Bedrosian, Nina Tamirisa, Gildy V Babiera, Yu Shen, Simona F Shaitelman

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha M BuszekDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Heather Y LinDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Isabelle BedrosianDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Nina TamirisaDepartment of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Gildy V BabieraPhysicians Network, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Yu ShenDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Simona F ShaitelmanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: sfshaitelman@mdanderson.org.
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · US

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeintensification of adjuvant therapy is being considered for older women with early-stage, biologically favorable breast cancer. Although radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in some cases, toxicity from hormone therapy (HT) is not trivial, and adherence rates vary. We hypothesized that adjuvant RT alone would produce survival outcomes comparable to those with adjuvant HT alone among elderly patients treated with lumpectomy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We searched the National Cancer Database (2010-2014) for healthy women (aged ≥70 years, Charlson/Deyo [CD] score 0-1) with T1N0 hormone-receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer treated with lumpectomy and adjuvant HT or RT. Propensity scores were used to match patients for analysis.

resultsWe identified 2995 patients (median age, 78 years), most (81%) with a CD score of 0, clinical stage IA (77%), of whom 65% received HT alone and 35% received RT only after lumpectomy. On multivariate analysis of the matched cohort, older age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.13; P < .001), CD score 1 (HR 1.92; 95% CI 1.37-2.70; P = .0002), and living in a metropolitan (vs urban) area (HR 3.09; 95% CI 1.43-6.67; P = .004) were associated with inferior overall survival (OS), whereas treatment with HT (vs RT) was not (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.85-1.49; P = .406). At a median follow-up of 45 months, no difference was found in OS between HT versus RT cohorts (85% and 86%, respectively; P = .44).

conclusionsFor healthy, older women with biologically favorable breast cancer treated with lumpectomy, adjuvant RT or HT is associated with equivalent 5-year OS rates. A randomized controlled trial is warranted to explore these adjuvant monotherapy options in elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Indexed as

Mastectomy, SegmentalRadiotherapy, AdjuvantAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansIncomeLogistic ModelsMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm StagingPropensity ScoreAntineoplastic Agents, HormonalReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, Progesterone

Identifiers

PMID31377160
PMCPMC7047656
OpenAlexW2965650173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.