Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31376830›Full record

SynthesisBMC family practice2019

Communication practices for delivering health behaviour change conversations in primary care: a systematic review and thematic synthesis.

C Albury, A Hall, A Syed, S Ziebland, E Stokoe, N Roberts, H Webb, P Aveyard

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Assessment of Oral Health Literacy and Influencing Factors: Retrospective Analysis of Patients Treated by Dental Students.European journal of dental education : official journal of the Association for Dental Education in Europe · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Evaluation of Co-Developed Strategies to Support Staff of a Mental Health Community Managed Organisation Implement Preventive Care: A Pilot Controlled Trial.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

C AlburyNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK. charlotte.albury@phc.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-6626
A HallPrimary Healthcare Research Unit, Health Sciences Centre, Memorial University, 300 Prince Philip Drive, St. John's, NL, A1B 3V6, Canada.
A SyedDepartment of English Language, Faculty of Languages and Linguistics, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
S ZieblandNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
E StokoeSchool of Social Sciences, Brockington Building, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE 11 3TU, UK.
N RobertsBodleian Health Care Libraries, Knowledge Centre, ORC Research Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7DQ, UK.
H WebbDepartment of Computer Science, Human Centred Computing (HCC) Group, University of Oxford, 39a St Giles, Oxford, OX1 3LW, UK.
P AveyardNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Observatory Quarter, Woodstock Road, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical guidelines exhort clinicians to encourage patients to improve their health behaviours. However, most offer little support on how to have these conversations in practice. Clinicians fear that health behaviour change talk will create interactional difficulties and discomfort for both clinician and patient. This review aims to identify how healthcare professionals can best communicate with patients about health behaviour change (HBC).

methodsWe included studies which used conversation analysis or discourse analysis to study recorded interactions between healthcare professionals and patients. We followed an aggregative thematic synthesis approach. This involved line-by-line coding of the results and discussion sections of included studies, and the inductive development and hierarchical grouping of descriptive themes. Top-level themes were organised to reflect their conversational positioning.

resultsOf the 17,562 studies identified through systematic searching, ten papers were included. Analysis resulted in 10 top-level descriptive themes grouped into three domains: initiating; carrying out; and closing health behaviour change talk. Of three methods of initiation, two facilitated further discussion, and one was associated with outright resistance. Of two methods of conducting behaviour change talk, one was associated with only minimal patient responses. One way of closing was identified, and patients did not seem to respond to this positively. Results demonstrated a series of specific conversational practices which clinicians use when talking about HBC, and how patients respond to these. Our results largely complemented clinical guidelines, providing further detail on how they can best be delivered in practice. However, one recommended practice - linking a patient's health concerns and their health behaviours - was shown to receive variable responses and to often generate resistance displays.

conclusionsHealth behaviour change talk is smoothly initiated, conducted, and terminated by clinicians and this rarely causes interactional difficulty. However, initiating conversations by linking a person's current health concern with their health behaviour can lead to resistance to advice, while other strategies such as capitalising on patient initiated discussions, or collaborating through question-answer sequences, may be well received.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorHealth PromotionPhysician-Patient RelationsPrimary Health CareHumansPatient Education as TopicBehaviour changeCommunication skillsDoctor-patient communicationGeneral practiceHealth behavioursHealthcare deliveryPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID31376830
PMCPMC6679536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.