Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31376518›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage2019

Automated lesion segmentation with BIANCA: Impact of population-level features, classification algorithm and locally adaptive thresholding.

Vaanathi Sundaresan, Giovanna Zamboni, Campbell Le Heron, Peter M Rothwell, Masud Husain, Marco Battaglini, Nicola De Stefano, Mark Jenkinson, Ludovica Griffanti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cerebral small vessel disease lesion segmentation methods: A systematic review.Cerebral circulation - cognition and behavior · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Mapping the interplay of atrial fibrillation, brain structure, and cognitive dysfunction.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Brain imaging and neuropsychological assessment of individuals recovered from a mild to moderate SARS-CoV-2 infection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vaanathi SundaresanWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Oxford-Nottingham Centre for Doctoral Training in Biomedical Imaging, University of Oxford, UK; Oxford India Centre for Sustainable Development, Somerville College, University of Oxford, UK. Electronic address: vaanathi.sundaresan@dtc.ox.ac.uk.
Giovanna ZamboniWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK; Centre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Campbell Le HeronNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; New Zealand Brain Research Institute, Christchurch 8011, New Zealand.
Peter M RothwellCentre for Prevention of Stroke and Dementia, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Masud HusainNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Wellcome Centre for Integrative NeuroImaging, University of Oxford, UK.
Marco BattagliniDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Nicola De StefanoDepartment of Medicine, Surgery and Neuroscience, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Mark JenkinsonWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Ludovica GriffantiWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Oxford Centre for Functional MRI of the Brain, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/L023784/2Parkinson's UK J-0901Wellcome Trust 206330/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) or white matter lesions exhibit high variability in their characteristics both at population- and subject-level, making their detection a challenging task. Population-level factors such as age, vascular risk factors and neurodegenerative diseases affect lesion load and spatial distribution. At the individual level, WMH vary in contrast, amount and distribution in different white matter regions. In this work, we aimed to improve BIANCA, the FSL tool for WMH segmentation, in order to better deal with these sources of variability. We worked on two stages of BIANCA by improving the lesion probability map estimation (classification stage) and making the lesion probability map thresholding stage automated and adaptive to local lesion probabilities. Firstly, in order to take into account the effect of population-level factors, we included population-level lesion probabilities, modelled with respect to a parametric factor (e.g. age), in the classification stage. Secondly, we tested BIANCA performance when using four alternative classifiers commonly used in the literature with respect to K-nearest neighbour algorithm (currently used for lesion probability map estimation in BIANCA). Finally, we propose LOCally Adaptive Threshold Estimation (LOCATE), a supervised method for determining optimal local thresholds to apply to the estimated lesion probability map, as an alternative option to global thresholding (i.e. applying the same threshold to the entire lesion probability map). For these experiments we used data from a neurodegenerative cohort, a vascular cohort and the cohorts available publicly as a part of a segmentation challenge. We observed that including population-level parametric lesion probabilities with respect to age and using alternative machine learning techniques provided negligible improvement. However, LOCATE provided a substantial improvement in the lesion segmentation performance, when compared to the global thresholding. It allowed to detect more deep lesions and provided better segmentation of periventricular lesion boundaries, despite the differences in the lesion spatial distribution and load across datasets. We further validated LOCATE on a cohort of CADASIL (Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy) patients, a genetic form of cerebral small vessel disease, and healthy controls, showing that LOCATE adapts well to wide variations in lesion load and spatial distribution.

Indexed as

AgingMachine LearningAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsBrain DiseasesFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNeuroimagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedWhite MatterLesion probability mapLesion segmentationMachine learningStructural MRIThresholdingWhite matter hyperintensities

Identifiers

PMID31376518
PMCPMC6996003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.