ArticlePoultry science2019
Use of a maltodextrin-based feed with a lysozyme product to alter bacterial in the ileum of market-aged broilers.
Article in Poultry science, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Poultry meats can become contaminated with pathogenic bacteria through digesta leakage during processing. Reducing the bacteria load in digesta of market-aged broilers prior to processing reduces the incidence of fecal contamination at the processing plant. A lysozyme product was incorporated in a maltodextrin-based feed offered during the pre-shipping feed withdrawal period to reduce bacteria in ileal contents of market-aged broilers. Twenty 36-day-old broilers were randomly allocated to each of 16 pens. For a 9 h period each pen was randomly assigned to one of the following treatments: no feed, maltodextrin-based feed with a lysozyme product (Inovapure) added at 0, 10, or 20 g per kg of feed. Feed consumption was determined and a minimum of 3 birds were randomly selected from each pen and euthanized. The ileal contents were removed and weighed. Samples were analyzed for Clostridium perfringens, aerobic bacteria, Enterobacteriaceae, E. coli, and coliform numbers using standard culturing techniques and next generation sequencing was performed to determine population shifts. Bacteria counts were transformed to log10 colony forming units (cfu) and analyzed as a completely randomized design. The data from next generation sequencing was analyzed as a 3 × 5 factorial design using Proc Mixed of SAS. Lysozyme did not affect feed consumption nor were the weight of ileal contents different for birds fed maltodextrin-based feeds compared to birds on traditional feed withdrawal. E. coli/coliforms and Enterobacteriaceae plates had no signs of bacterial growth. The number of Clostridium perfringens and aerobic bacteria in the ileal contents of market-aged broilers was not different between treatments using the traditional culturing techniques. Next generation sequencing was a useful alternative to traditional culture techniques as results revealed that bacilli were reduced and clostridia increased for the 20 g lysozyme treatment. Addition of lysozyme to a maltodextrin based feed did not change overall numbers of bacteria but was effective in altering the participants in the bacteria community in ileal contents of market-aged broilers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.