Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31376276›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2019

Early Effect Markers and Exposure Determinants of Metalworking Fluids Among Metal Industry Workers: Protocol for a Field Study.

Nancy B Hopf, Eve Bourgkard, Valérie Demange, Sébastien Hulo, Jean-Jacques Sauvain, Ronan Levilly, Fanny Jeandel, Alain Robert, Yves Guichard, Jacques André Pralong and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Exposure to ZnO/TiOInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nancy B Hopf *Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4490-6109
Eve Bourgkard *Department of Epidemiology, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6115-165X
Valérie Demange *Department of Epidemiology, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2945-2564
Sébastien Hulo *IMPECS- EA 4483, Department of Occupational Health, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7817-9974
Jean-Jacques Sauvain *Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9541-9749
Ronan LevillyProcess Engineering Department, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-4226
Fanny JeandelToxicology and Biometrology Department, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9650-4622
Alain RobertToxicology and Biometrology Department, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1106-3384
Yves GuichardToxicology and Biometrology Department, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre cedex, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1947-1745
Jacques André PralongDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7008-7162
Nathalie Chérot-KornobisIMPECS- EA 4483, Department of Occupational Health, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8893-5972
Jean-Louis EdméIMPECS- EA 4483, Department of Occupational Health, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6580-581X
Pascal WildDepartment of Occupational and Environmental Health, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3165-3808
Centre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHInstitut National de Recherche et de Sécurité · FRUniversité de Lille · FRZimmer Biomet (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExposure to aerosols from metalworking fluids (MWF) has previously been related to a series of adverse health outcomes (eg, cancer, respiratory diseases). Our present epidemiological study focuses on occupational exposures to MWF and a panel of exposure and effect biomarkers. We hypothesize that these health outcomes are caused by particle exposure that generates oxidative stress, leading to airway inflammation and ultimately to chronic respiratory diseases. We aimed to assess whether MWF exposure, in particular as characterized by its oxidative potential, is associated with biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation as well as genotoxic effects.

objectiveThe ultimate goal is to develop exposure reduction strategies based on exposure determinants that best predict MWF-related health outcomes. The following relationships will be explored: (1) exposure determinants and measured exposure; (2) occupational exposure and preclinical and clinical effect markers; (3) exposure biomarkers and biomarkers of effect in both exhaled breath condensate and urine; and (4) biomarkers of effect, genotoxic effects and respiratory symptoms.

methodsAt least 90 workers from France and Switzerland (30 controls, 30 exposed to straight MWF and 30 to aqueous MWF) were followed over three consecutive days after a nonexposed period of at least two days. The exposure assessment is based on MWF, metal, aldehyde, and ultrafine particle number concentrations, as well as the intrinsic oxidative potential of aerosols. Furthermore, exposure biomarkers such as metals, metabolites of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitrosamine are measured in exhaled breath condensate and urine. Oxidative stress biomarkers (malondialdehyde, 8-isoprostane, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, nitrates, and nitrites) and exhaled nitric oxide, an airway inflammation marker, are repeatedly measured in exhaled breath condensate and urine. Genotoxic effects are assessed using the buccal micronucleus cytome assay. The statistical analyses will include modelling exposure as a function of exposure determinants, modelling the evolution of the biomarkers of exposure and effect as a function of the measured exposure, and modelling respiratory symptoms and genotoxic effects as a function of the assessed long-term exposure.

resultsData collection, which occurred from January 2018 until June 2019, included 20 companies. At the date of writing, the study included 100 subjects and 29 nonoccupationally exposed controls.

conclusionsThis study is unique as it comprises human biological samples, questionnaires, and MWF exposure measurement. The biomarkers collected in our study are all noninvasive and are useful in monitoring MWF exposed workers. The aim is to develop preventative strategies based on exposure determinants related to health outcomes. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/13744.

Indexed as

early effect biomarkersexposure biomarkersgenotoxic effectsmetalworking fluidoccupational epidemiologyoxidative stress

Identifiers

PMID31376276
PMCPMC6696856
OpenAlexW2947687506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.