Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31376200›Full record

ArticleAddiction (Abingdon, England)2020

Should cigarette pack sizes be capped?

Anna K M Blackwell, Ilse Lee, Michelle Scollo, Melanie Wakefield, Marcus R Munafò, Theresa M Marteau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction (Abingdon, England), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Small/Kiddie Cigarette Packaging Size and Its Impact on Smoking: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Should cigarette pack sizes be capped?Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna K M BlackwellUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4984-1818
Ilse LeeBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7674-6090
Michelle ScolloCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6583-4730
Melanie WakefieldCentre for Behavioural Research in Cancer, Melbourne, Vic, Australia.
Marcus R MunafòUK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4049-993X
Theresa M MarteauBehaviour and Health Research Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3025-1129

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 206853/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVery few countries regulate maximum cigarette pack size. Larger, non-standard sizes are increasingly being introduced by the tobacco industry. Larger portion sizes increase food consumption; larger cigarette packs may similarly increase tobacco consumption. Here we consider the evidence for legislation to cap cigarette pack size to reduce tobacco-related harm. AIMS AND ANALYSIS: We first describe the regulations regarding minimum and maximum pack sizes in the 12 countries that have adopted plain packaging legislation and describe the range of sizes available. We then discuss evidence for two key assumptions that would support capping pack size. First, regarding the causal nature of the relationship between pack size and tobacco consumption, observational evidence suggests that people smoke fewer cigarettes when using smaller packs. Secondly, regarding the causal nature of the relationship between reducing consumption and successful cessation, reductions in number of cigarettes smoked per day are associated with increased cessation attempts and subsequent abstinence. However, more experimental evidence is needed to infer the causal nature of these associations among general populations of smokers.

conclusionCigarette pack size is positively associated with consumption and consumption is negatively associated with cessation. Based on limited evidence of the causal nature of these associations, we hypothesize that government regulations to cap cigarette pack sizes would positively contribute to reducing smoking prevalence.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingHumansProduct PackagingSmokersTobacco IndustryTobacco Productschoice architectureCigarette pack sizepolicyportion sizepublic healthtobacco control

Identifiers

PMID31376200
PMCPMC7187431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.