ArticleEcoHealth2019
Carnivore Protoparvovirus 1 at the Wild-Domestic Carnivore Interface in Northwestern Mexico.
Article in EcoHealth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surveillance of Parvovirus in Free-Roaming Dogs in the Qinling Mountains and Assessment of the Risk of Cross-Species Transmission to Giant Pandas.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Genomic Characterization of Clinical Canine Parvovirus Type 2c Infection in Wild Coyotes (Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Red Foxes (Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Identification of small circular DNA viruses in coyote fecal samples from Arizona (USA).Archives of virology · 2023Article
- First isolation and molecular characterization of canine parvovirus-type 2b (CPV-2b) from red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) living in the wild habitat of Turkey.Virology journal · 2023Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Eighty-three wild and domestic carnivores of nine species from Janos Biosphere Reserve (JBR), Mexico, were tested by serologic and molecular assays to determine exposure and infection rates of carnivore protoparvovirus 1. Overall, 50.8% (33/65) of the wild carnivores and 100% (18/18) of the domestic dogs tested were seropositive for Canine protoparvovirus 1 (CPV), while 23% (15/65) of the wild carnivores and 22.2% (4/18) of the domestic dogs were PCR positive for CPV. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed circulation of CVP-2 with residues 426 Asn (CPV2a = 1/19) and 426 Glu (CPV-2c = 18/19) among carnivores in JBR. The prevalence of both PCR positivity and antibodies to CPV varied significantly among wild host species. Of the six identified haplotypes, three were unique to kit foxes (Vulpes macrotis) (the species with higher haplotype richness) and two to striped skunks (Mephitis mephitis). The remaining haplotype was shared among all carnivore species including dogs suggesting non-host specificity and bidirectional and continuous viral transmission cycle in the JBR. The phylogenetic similarity of CPV strains from dogs and wild carnivores and the higher prevalence of CPV in wild carnivores captured near towns relative to those captured far from towns suggest that dogs might be an important source of CPV infection for wild carnivores in the JBR. We provide evidence that cross-species transmission occurs at the domestic-wildlife interface in JBR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31375949What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.