Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375934›Full record

SynthesisCurrent cardiology reports2019

For Whom the Bell Tolls : Refining Risk Assessment for Sudden Cardiac Death.

Ivaylo Tonchev, David Luria, David Orenstein, Chaim Lotan, Yitschak Biton

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Current cardiology reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. [(LV)EF is a poor predictor of sudden cardiac death : Pro/Contra].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ivaylo TonchevHadassah Medical Center, Heart Institute, Hebrew University in Jerusalem Medical School, Kyriat Hadassah, PO Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
David LuriaHadassah Medical Center, Heart Institute, Hebrew University in Jerusalem Medical School, Kyriat Hadassah, PO Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
David OrensteinHadassah Medical Center, Heart Institute, Hebrew University in Jerusalem Medical School, Kyriat Hadassah, PO Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Chaim LotanHadassah Medical Center, Heart Institute, Hebrew University in Jerusalem Medical School, Kyriat Hadassah, PO Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel.
Yitschak BitonHadassah Medical Center, Heart Institute, Hebrew University in Jerusalem Medical School, Kyriat Hadassah, PO Box 12000, 91120, Jerusalem, Israel. yitscb@gmail.com.
Hadassah Medical Center · ILUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sudden cardiac death is one of the most important causes of death worldwide. Advancements in medical treatment, percutaneous interventions, and device therapy (ICD and CRTD) showed consistent reduction in mortality, mainly in survivors of SCD and in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and depressed left ventricular function. Patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, mildly reduced LV function, and channelopathies have increased risk for SCD. Identifying the subgroup of these patients before they experience life-threatening or fatal events is essential to further improve outcomes. In this review, we aimed to summarize the current knowledge for risk stratification and primary prevention, to describe the gaps in evidence, and to discuss future directions for screening and treating patients at risk for SCD. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive description of the etiologies of sudden cardiac death, risk stratification strategies, and to describe the current medical and interventional therapies. We aimed to discuss the current gaps in our knowledge of primary prevention of SCD and to review novel approaches and interventions. RECENT

findingsThe incidence of SCD has decreased in the last two decades due to improved pharmacological treatment and ICD implantation in SCD survivors and in patients with reduced left ventricular function and ischemic cardiomyopathy. The efficacy of ICD in patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy is challenged by new findings from the DANISH trial. Catheter ablation is new emerging strategy to prevent SCD in patients with scar relater or PVC-triggered ventricular arrhythmias. Despite the new treatments, SCD is still a major burden. ICD remains the cornerstone for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy, whereas appropriate risk stratification of the patients with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and channelopathies is needed to further improve outcomes. The future of ablation as the treatment and prevention of SCD remains to be studied.

Indexed as

Death, Sudden, CardiacHumansPrimary PreventionRisk AssessmentAblation therapyCardiac resynchronization therapyImplantable cardioverter defibrillatorPrimary and secondary preventionSudden cardiac deathVentricular arrhythmia

Identifiers

PMID31375934
OpenAlexW2966500018

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.