Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375876›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2019

Medialization of medial row anchor via the Nevasier portal yield enhanced footprint and outcomes in medium-to-large rotator cuff tears.

Seung-Bae Oh, Jae-Jung Jeong, Jong-Hun Ji, Kaushal Patel, Won-Ha Hwang, Joon-Hyung Cho

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 86% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biceps-incorporating rotator cuff repair with footprint medialization in large-to-massive rotator cuff tears.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Seung-Bae OhDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae-Jung JeongDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jong-Hun JiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea. jijh87@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1087-3254
Kaushal PatelDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Won-Ha HwangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Joon-Hyung ChoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon St.Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
St. Mary's Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes of medial row anchor insertion between 90° or 45° (deadman) angle in the suture-bridge rotator cuff repair of medium-to-large rotator cuff tears.

methodsThis retrospective analysis included 113 consecutive patients undergoing arthroscopic suture-bridge repair for medium-to-large rotator cuff tears (mean tear size: 2.8 × 2.3 cm) between 2010 and 2013. The patients were divided into two groups: group I (53 patients) and group II (60 patients) involving 90° and 45° medial row anchors, respectively. The conventional lateral row anchors were inserted in the suture-bridge repair. The clinical outcomes at 2 years and radiological outcomes including re-tear or footprint coverage (anteroposterior length and mediolateral width) of the repaired tendon using postoperative MRI were evaluated.

resultsClinical outcome scores were significantly improved in both groups. However, Group I (90° anchor insertion group) showed better clinical scores without the difference of range of motion. The postoperative MRI revealed enlarged footprint coverage with 90° medial row anchor. The repaired footprint cuff size (mediolateral width) in the coronal plane MRI showed a statistically significant difference (45°: 19 mm vs. 90°: 24 mm) (p < 0.05).

conclusionsEnhanced clinical outcomes and additional anatomical footprint coverage (coronal width of repaired tendon) in the suture-bridge repair are obtained with the 90° medial row anchors compared with the 45° medial row anchors. These findings would guide clinical application of 90° medial row anchor insertion for further medialization in the medium-to-large rotator cuff tears. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III (retrospective comparative trial).

Indexed as

Suture AnchorsSuture TechniquesAgedArthroscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiographyRetrospective StudiesRotator Cuff Injuries45° anchor insertion90° anchor insertionMedial row anchorSuture-bridge rotator cuff repair

Identifiers

PMID31375876
OpenAlexW2965336385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.