The p value wars (again).

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Sonographic, Demographic, and Clinical Characteristics of Pre- and Postmenopausal Women with Endometrial Cancer; Results from a Post Hoc Analysis of the IETA4 (International Endometrial Tumor Analysis) Multicenter Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
   Article
2. Poor statistical reporting, inadequate data presentation and spin persist despite Journal awareness and updatedF1000Research · 2023
   Article
3. Generalizability, Robustness and Replicability When Evaluating Wellbeing of Laboratory Mice with Various Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
   Article
4. Phylogenetic diversity analysis of shotgun metagenomic reads describes gut microbiome development and treatment effects in the post-weaned pig.PloS one · 2022
   Article
5. Multiplicity Eludes Peer Review: The Case of COVID-19 Research.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
   Observational
6. Improving target assessment in biomedical research: the GOT-IT recommendations.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2021
   Review
7. Why we habitually engage in null-hypothesis significance testing: A qualitative study.PloS one · 2021
   Article
8. Editorial commentary to "European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2020
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as