ArticleMutagenesis2019
KRAS pathway expression changes in pancreatic cancer models by conventional and experimental taxanes.
Article in Mutagenesis, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Third-generation taxanes SB-T-121605 and SB-T-121606 are effective in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.iScience · 2024Article
- Anticancer regimens containing third generation taxanes SB-T-121605 and SB-T-121606 are highly effective in resistant ovarian carcinoma model.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Article
- The Role of TRIP6, ABCC3 and CPS1 Expression in Resistance of Ovarian Cancer to Taxanes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
The KRAS signalling pathway is pivotal for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) development. After the failure of most conventional cytotoxic and targeted therapeutics tested so far, the combination of taxane nab-paclitaxel (Abraxane) with gemcitabine recently demonstrated promising improvements in the survival of PDAC patients. This study aimed to explore interactions of conventional paclitaxel and experimental taxane SB-T-1216 with the KRAS signalling pathway expression in in vivo and in vitro PDAC models in order to decipher potential predictive biomarkers or targets for future individualised therapy. Mouse PDAC PaCa-44 xenograft model was used for evaluation of changes in transcript and protein levels of the KRAS signalling pathway caused by administration of experimental taxane SB-T-1216 in vivo. Subsequently, KRAS wild-type (BxPc-3) and mutated (MiaPaCa-2 and PaCa-44) cell line models were treated with paclitaxel to verify dysregulation of the KRAS signalling pathway gene expression profile in vitro and investigate the role of KRAS mutation status. By comparing the gene expression profiles, this study observed for the first time that in vitro cell models differ in the basal transcriptional profile of the KRAS signalling pathway, but there were no differences between KRAS mutated and wild-type cells in sensitivity to taxanes. Generally, the taxane administration caused a downregulation of the KRAS signalling pathway both in vitro and in vivo, but this effect was not dependent on the KRAS mutation status. In conclusion, putative biomarkers for prediction of taxane activity or targets for stimulation of taxane anticancer effects were not discovered by the KRAS signalling pathway profiling in various PDAC models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.