Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375764›Full record

ArticleModern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc2020

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: immune cell composition according to subtype.

Marie Colombe Agahozo, Mieke R van Bockstal, Floris H Groenendijk, Thierry P P van den Bosch, Pieter J Westenend, Carolien H M van Deurzen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Immune response and stromal changes in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast are subtype dependent.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie Colombe AgahozoDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. m.agahozo@erasmusmc.nl.
Mieke R van BockstalDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4498-928X
Floris H GroenendijkDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Thierry P P van den BoschDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Pieter J WestenendLaboratory for Pathology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
Carolien H M van DeurzenDepartment of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast includes several subtypes with a divergent biological behavior. Data regarding the composition of ductal carcinoma in situ-associated immune cells and their potential role in progression is limited. We studied ductal carcinoma in situ-associated immune response by characterizing immune cell subsets according to ductal carcinoma in situ subtypes. Ductal carcinoma in situ-associated tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) density was evaluated based on hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections from 473 patients. Cases were subtyped based on ER, PR, and HER2. Patients were categorized as TIL-high or low. Ductal carcinoma in situ-associated immune cells of TIL-high cases were immunostained on whole slides with CD4, CD8, CD20, CD68, FOXP3, and PD-L1 (SP142 and SP263). In total, 131/473 patients (28.0%) were considered as TIL-high. The percentage of TIL-high cases was significantly higher in HER2+ and triple-negative ductal carcinoma in situ (P < 0.0001). Overall, no statistical difference in immune cell composition according to subtypes was found. However, individual subtype comparison showed that ER+ HER2+ cases had a significantly higher proportion of CD8+ T cells compared with triple-negative cases (P = 0.047). In TIL-high cases, PD-L1-SP142 expression on tumor cells was associated with subtype (P = 0.037); the lowest number of positive cases was observed in the HER2+ subtype (independent of ER). However, in TIL-high ductal carcinoma in situ, PD-L1 expression by both clones was limited. In conclusion, high numbers of TILs are predominantly observed in HER+ and triple negative ductal carcinoma in situ. The ER+ HER2+ subtype seems to attract a higher proportion of CD8+ T cells compared with the triple negative subtype. Among TIL-high cases, the HER2+ subgroup had the lowest PD-L1-SP142 expression on tumor cells. This suggests a more pronounced antitumor immunity in HER2+ ductal carcinoma in situ, which could play a role in its biological behavior.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Intraductal, NoninfiltratingCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCD8-Positive T-LymphocytesErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunophenotypingLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMiddle AgedPhenotypeB7-H1 AntigenBiomarkers, TumorCD274 protein, humanERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID31375764
OpenAlexW2965509726

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.