Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375631›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019

The entropic bond in colloidal crystals.

Eric S Harper, Greg van Anders, Sharon C Glotzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A theory of entropic bonding.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Journal of applied crystallography · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Role of Entropy in Colloidal Self-Assembly.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  10. Statistical reprogramming of macroscopic self-assembly with dynamic boundaries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eric S HarperDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040.
Greg van AndersDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2136.
Sharon C GlotzerDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1040; sglotzer@umich.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A vast array of natural phenomena can be understood through the long-established schema of chemical bonding. Conventional chemical bonds arise through local gradients resulting from the rearrangement of electrons; however, it is possible that the hallmark features of chemical bonding could arise through local gradients resulting from nonelectronic forms of mediation. If other forms of mediation give rise to "bonds" that act like conventional ones, recognizing them as bonds could open new forms of supramolecular descriptions of phenomena at the nano- and microscales. Here, we show via a minimal model that crowded hard-particle systems governed solely by entropy exhibit the hallmark features of bonding despite the absence of chemical interactions. We quantitatively characterize these features and compare them to those exhibited by chemical bonds to argue for the existence of entropic bonds. As an example of the utility of the entropic bond classification, we demonstrate the nearly equivalent tradeoff between chemical bonds and entropic bonds in the colloidal crystallization of hard hexagonal nanoplates.

Indexed as

bondingcolloidsentropyself-assemblysoft matter

Identifiers

PMID31375631
PMCPMC6708323

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.