Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375617›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2019

Lumbar spine surgery across 15 years: trends, complications and reoperations in a longitudinal observational study from Norway.

Margreth Grotle, Milada Cvancarova Småstuen, Olaf Fjeld, Lars Grøvle, Jon Helgeland, Kjersti Storheim, Tore K Solberg, John-Anker Zwart

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 104 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
12.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05963815 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Spine Patient Reported Outcome Measures: a Cohort Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorPark Medical centrumRan2023 to 2030Enrolled4,000ConditionsLumbar Disc Herniation, Spondylolisthesis, Spinal StenosisArmsSpine surgery
NCT06270654 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Management of Perioperative Pain Using Erector Spinae Plane Block in Open Microscopic Lumbar Surgery

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of MalayaRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsLumbar Spine DiseaseArmsErector spinae plane block, Skin infiltration LA
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The influence of psychological factors on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Outcomes following spinal instrumented fusions in patients with parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. ISSLS Prize in Clinical Science 2025: A randomized trial on three different minimally invasive decompression techniques for lumbar spinal stenosis. Five years follow-up from the NORDSTEN-SST.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2025
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. The efficacy of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) versus freehand ESPB in postoperative pain management after lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, non-inferiority trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Trial
  13. Postoperative quality of recovery with erector spinae plane block or thoracolumbar interfascial plane block after major spinal surgery: a randomized controlled trial.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Friend or Foe: The Use of Cannabis as a Potential Analgesic in Postoperative Lumbar Spine Surgery.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2026
    Review
  20. Review

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Margreth GrotleDepartment of Physiotherapy, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Milada Cvancarova SmåstuenDepartment of Nursing and Health Promotion, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Olaf FjeldResearch and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Disorders, Oslo universitetssykehus Ulleval, Oslo, Norway.
Lars GrøvleDepartment of Rheumatology, Hospital of Ostfold HF, Norway.
Jon HelgelandDivision of Health Services, Nasjonalt folkehelseinstitutt, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9348-7844
Kjersti StorheimResearch and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo, Norway.
Tore K SolbergNeurosurgery, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
John-Anker ZwartDepartment of Neurology and FORMI, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOOslo University Hospital · NOØstfold Hospital Trust · NOUniversity Hospital of North Norway · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStudies from different Western countries have reported a rapid increase in spinal surgery rates, an increase that exceeds by far the growing incidence rates of spinal disorders in the general population. There are few studies covering all lumbar spine surgery and no previous studies from Norway.

objectivesThe purpose of this study was to investigate trends in all lumbar spine surgery in Norway over 15 years, including length of hospital stay, and rates of complications and reoperations.

designA longitudinal observational study over 15 years using hospital patient administrative data and sociodemographic data from the National Registry in Norway. SETTING AND

participantsPatients aged ≥18 years discharged from Norwegian public hospitals between 1999 and 2013. OUTCOME MEASURES: Annual rates of simple (microsurgical discectomy, decompression) and complex surgical procedures (fusion, disc prosthesis) in the lumbar spine.

resultsThe rate of lumbar spine surgery increased by 54%, from 78 (95% CI (75 to 80)) to 120 (107 to 113) per 100 000, from 1999 to 2013. More men had simple surgery whereas more women had complex surgery. Among elderly people over 75 years, lumbar surgery increased by a factor of five during the 15-year period. The rates of complications were low, but increased from 0.7% in 1999 to 2.4% in 2013.

conclusionsThere was a substantial increase in lumbar spine surgery in Norway from 1999 to 2013, similar to trends in other Western world countries. The rise in lumbar surgery among elderly people represents a significant workload and challenge for health services, given our aging population.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedDecompression, SurgicalDiskectomyFemaleHospitals, PublicHumansLength of StayLongitudinal StudiesLumbar VertebraeMaleMicrosurgeryMiddle AgedNorwayPostoperative Complicationsepidemiologyneurosurgeryorthopaedic and trauma surgery

Identifiers

PMID31375617
PMCPMC6688683
OpenAlexW2966798804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.