Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375614›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2019

Pilot study to build capacity for family medicine with abbreviated, low-cost training programme with minimal impact on patient care for a cohort of 84 general practitioners caring for Palestinian refugees in Jordan.

Amjad Al Shdaifat, Therese Zink

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Amjad Al ShdaifatInternal and Family Medicine Department, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0001-7082-4601
Therese ZinkFamily Medicine, Warren Alpert Medical School; Behavioral and Social Sciences, School of Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA theresezink@gmail.com.
Brown University · USHashemite University · JO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStudies document that primary care improves health outcomes and controls costs. In regions of the world where primary care is underdeveloped, building capacity is essential. Most capacity building programmes are expensive and take physicians away from their clinical settings. We describe a programme created, delivered and evaluated from 2013 to 2014 in Jordan.

designCohort study.

settingPhysicians providing primary care in the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees clinics in Jordan.

participantsEighty-four general practitioners (GPs) were invited to participate and completed the training and evaluation. GPs are physicians who have a license to practice medicine after completing medical school and a 1 year hospital-based rotating internship. Although GPs provide care in the ambulatory setting, their hospital-based education provides little preparation for delivering ambulatory primary care. INTERVENTION/PROGRAMME: This three-stage programme included needs assessment, didactics and on-the-job coaching. First, the learning needs and baseline knowledge of the trainees were assessed and the findings guided curriculum development. During the second stage, 48 hours of didactics covered topics such as communications skills and disease management. The third stage was delivered one on one in the trainee's clinical setting for a 4 to 6-hour block. The first, middle and final patient interactions were evaluated. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Preknowledge and postknowledge assessments were compared. The clinical checklist, developed for the programme, assessed eight domains of clinical skills such as communication and history taking on a five-point Likert scale during the patient interaction.

resultsPreknowledge and postknowledge assessments demonstrated significantly improved scores, 46% to 81% (p<0.0001). Trainee's clinical checklist scores improved over the assessment intervals. Satisfaction with the training was high.

conclusionThis programme is a potential model for building primary care capacity at low cost and with little impact on patient care that addresses both knowledge and clinical skills on the job.

Indexed as

RefugeesArabsCapacity BuildingCohort StudiesFamily PracticeGeneral PractitionersHumansJordanMaleNeeds AssessmentPilot Projectseducationfamily medicinegeneral practicemiddle eastpostgraduatetraining

Identifiers

PMID31375614
PMCPMC6688676
OpenAlexW2964612170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.