ReviewJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2019
Quantitative Clinical Nuclear Cardiology, Part 1: Established Applications.
Review in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peak filling rate assessed by myocardial perfusion imaging predicts adverse outcomes in women with chronic coronary syndromes.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Ischemic Risk in Patients with Zero Coronary Artery Calcium Undergoing Stress PET/CT Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- A Clinical Impact Study of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging Comparing Three Different Cardiac Software Packages at 1-Year Follow-Up.World journal of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Patient-centric performance and interpretation of positron emission tomography /computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging: a clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging of the European Society of Cardiology.European heart journal. Imaging methods and practice · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Enhanced Perfusion Scoring Improves the Diagnostic Accuracy of Myocardial Perfusion Imaging.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Diagnosis of diffuse ischemia with SPECT relative perfusion imaging: How to eat soup with a fork?Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Preparing for the Artificial Intelligence Revolution in Nuclear Cardiology.Nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2023Review
- A highly predictive cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) risk score for 90-day and one-year major adverse cardiac events and revascularization.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023Article
- Prediction of 2-year major adverse cardiac events from myocardial perfusion scintigraphy and clinical risk factors.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Does quantification of [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022Article
- Reproducible Quantification of Regional Sympathetic Denervation with [Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Adding value to myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: A prediction tool to predict adverse cardiac outcomes and risk stratify.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Article
- Quantitative clinical nuclear cardiology, part 2: Evolving/emerging applications.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging has attained widespread clinical acceptance as a standard of care for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. A significant contribution to this success has been the use of computer techniques to provide objective quantitative assessment in the standardization of the interpretation of these studies. Software platforms have been developed as a pipeline to provide the quantitative algorithms researched, developed and validated to be clinically useful so diagnosticians everywhere can benefit from these tools. The goal of this continuing medical education article (part 1) is to describe the many quantitative tools that are clinically established and, more importantly, how clinicians should use them routinely in interpretation, clinical management, and therapy guidance for patients with coronary artery disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.