Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375399›Full record

ArticleJournal of geriatric oncology2020

Barriers to clinical trial enrollment of older adults with cancer: A qualitative study of the perceptions of community and academic oncologists.

Mina S Sedrak, Supriya G Mohile, Virginia Sun, Can-Lan Sun, Bihong T Chen, Daneng Li, Andrew R Wong, Kevin George, Simran Padam, Jennifer Liu and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of geriatric oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 82 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Increasing Diversity in Head and Neck Cancer Clinical Trials.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Stakeholder perspectives on the role of caregivers in cancer clinical trial decision-making: results of a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 clinical trial participation and awareness in Texas.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mina S SedrakDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America. Electronic address: msedrak@coh.org.
Supriya G MohileDepartment of Medicine, Hematology/Oncology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States of America.
Virginia SunDepartment of Population Science, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Can-Lan SunDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Bihong T ChenDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Daneng LiDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Andrew R WongDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Kevin GeorgeDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Simran PadamDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Jennifer LiuDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
Vani KatheriaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
William DaleDepartment of Supportive Care Medicine, City of Hope, Duarte, CA, United States of America.
City of Hope · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

URCC NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189961 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Michelle C Janelsins, KAREN M. MUSTIAN · 2014 to 2026
$67.7M
Oncology Research Career Development ProgramK12CA001727 · NCI · CITY OF HOPE NATIONAL MEDICAL CENTER · PI MORTIMER, JOANNE E. · 1992 to 2024
$14.6M
Geriatric Oncology Research Infrastructure to Improve Clinical CareR33AG059206 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI WILLIAM DALE, Heidi Diana Klepin · 2020 to 2026
$5.1M
A Patient-Oriented Research Program in Geriatric OncologyK24AG056589 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI Supriya G. Mohile · 2018 to 2026
$1.5M
Mentoring the Next Generation of Geriatric Oncology Researchers in Patient-Oriented Research to Improve the Care of Older Adults with CancerK24AG055693 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI WILLIAM DALE · 2018 to 2026
$1.4M
Geriatric Oncology Research Infrastructure to Improve Clinical CareR21AG059206 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI DALE, WILLIAM, MOHILE, SUPRIYA G. · 2018 to 2019
$478k
Improving Clinical Trial Participation of Older Adults with CancerR03AG064377 · NIA · BECKMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE/CITY OF HOPE · PI SEDRAK, MINA S · 2019 to 2020
$260k
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA001727NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189961NIA NIH HHS K24 AG055693NIA NIH HHS K24 AG056589NIA NIH HHS R03 AG064377NIA NIH HHS R21 AG059206
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesOncologists can be one of the major barriers to older adult's participation in research. Multiple studies have described academic clinicians' concerns for not enrolling older adults onto trials. Although the majority of older adults receive their cancer care in the community, few studies have examined the unique challenges that community oncologists face and how they differ from oncologist-related barriers in academia.

methodsSemi-structured interviews were conducted by telephone or face-to-face with 44 medical oncologists (24 academic-based and 20 community-based) at City of Hope from March to June 2018. Interviews explored oncologists' perceptions of barriers to clinical trial enrollment of older adults with cancer. Data were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

resultsOf the 44 participants, 36% were women and 68% were in practice for >10 years. Among the entire sample, stringent eligibility criteria (n = 20) and oncologist concerns for treatment toxicities (n = 15) were the most commonly cited barriers. Compared to academic oncologists, community oncologists more often cited patient attitudes, beliefs, and understanding (n = 9 vs. n = 2) and caregiver burden (n = 6 vs. n = 0). In contrast, compared to community oncologists, academic oncologists more often cited oncologist bias (n = 10 vs. n = 3) and insufficient time/support (n = 4 vs. n = 1).

conclusionsDifferences in perceptions among academic and community oncologists about trials suggest that barriers are multifaceted, complex, and vary by practice setting. Interventions to increase trial accrual among older adults with cancer may benefit from being tailored to address the unique barriers of different practice settings.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOncologistsAgedAttitude of Health PersonnelFemaleHumansPerceptionQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID31375399
PMCPMC6989372
OpenAlexW2964650688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.