Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375106›Full record

ReviewBMC oral health2019

Effectiveness of preventive dental programs offered to mothers by non-dental professionals to control early childhood dental caries: a review.

Ajesh George, Mariana S Sousa, Ariana C Kong, Anthony Blinkhorn, Tiffany Patterson Norrie, Jann Foster, Hannah G Dahlen, Shilpi Ajwani, Maree Johnson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC oral health, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Midwives' knowledge and preventive practices regarding early childhood caries: a quantitative study in France.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Oral health among children participating in an extended home visiting programme-a case‒control study.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ajesh GeorgeCentre for Oral Health Outcomes and Research Translation (COHORT), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University/South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia. a.george@westernsydney.edu.au.
Mariana S SousaCentre for Oral Health Outcomes and Research Translation (COHORT), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University/South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Ariana C KongCentre for Oral Health Outcomes and Research Translation (COHORT), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University/South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Anthony BlinkhornSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, Australia.
Tiffany Patterson NorrieCentre for Oral Health Outcomes and Research Translation (COHORT), School of Nursing and Midwifery, Western Sydney University/South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Jann FosterIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Hannah G DahlenIngham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, NSW, 2170, Australia.
Shilpi AjwaniSchool of Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, 2050, Australia.
Maree JohnsonFaculty of Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, NSW, 2060, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly childhood caries is a common chronic childhood disease and maternal oral health is a risk factor. Improving the oral health behaviours of pregnant women/young mothers can positively influence the oral health of children and reduce their caries risk. Such preventative strategies have been undertaken by non-dental professionals producing mixed results encompassing various interventions across the perinatal period. However, no comprehensive review of these studies has been undertaken. The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness of maternal oral health programs undertaken during the antenatal and/or postnatal period by non-dental health professionals to reduce early childhood caries.

methodsA systematic search of five databases was undertaken using key search terms. Studies were included if they (a) involved quantitative study designs with a control; (b) were published in English; (c) reported on interventions delivered by non-dental professionals (d) delivered the intervention to expectant mothers or mothers with young infants up to 24 months; (e) measured outcomes when the child was under 5 years; (f) measured changes in oral health outcomes of children clinically and oral health behaviours of mothers or children. No restrictions were placed on the study quality and setting.

resultsNine studies met the inclusion criteria and involved interventions delivered by diverse non-dental professionals across the antenatal (n = 1), postnatal (n = 6) and perinatal period (n = 2). Most studies were of low methodological quality (n = 6). The interventions focussed on oral health education (n = 8), dental referrals (n = 3) and oral health assessments (n = 1). Interventions conducted in either the postnatal or antenatal periods showed meaningful improvements in children's clinical and mother's behavioural oral health outcomes. The outcomes appear to be sustained when a suite of interventions were used along with referral reminders. There were mixed results from interventions across the perinatal period.

conclusionsNon-dental professionals can promote maternal oral health by providing oral health education, risk assessment and referrals. Combining these interventions could provide a sustained improvement in oral health outcomes for children although current evidence is weak. More high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings and determine whether the antenatal and/or postnatal period is best suited to deliver these interventions.

Indexed as

Dental CariesHealth Education, DentalMothersChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantOral HealthPregnancyDental decayEarly childhoodNon-dental professionals

Identifiers

PMID31375106
PMCPMC6679429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.