Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31375099›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2019

An Italian pilot study of a psycho-social intervention to support family caregivers' engagement in taking care of patients with complex care needs: the Engage-in-Caring project.

E Guida, S Barello, A Corsaro, M C Galizi, F Giuffrida, G Graffigna, G Damiani

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Patient Engagement in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Study on Patients' and Nurses' Perspectives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

E GuidaScientific Institute, IRCCS E. Medea 0-3 Center for the at-Risk infant, Bosisio Parini, Lecco, Italy.
S BarelloDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy.
A CorsaroHealth management Office, Social workers' cooperative O.S.A, Rome, Italy. alice.corsaro12@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9683-9801
M C GaliziHealth management Office, Social workers' cooperative O.S.A, Rome, Italy.
F GiuffridaHealth management Office, Social workers' cooperative O.S.A, Rome, Italy.
G GraffignaDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, Milan, Italy.
G DamianiFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe raising of disability and chronic illness burden among European population is calling for a new paradigm of care, focused on primary health care interventions. Engage-In-Caring is a novel multicomponent intervention clearly dedicated to improve family caregiver engagement in the care of patients with complex care needs, by supporting them to develop a stronger consciousness of their role, needs and skills.

methodEngage-In-Caring intervention's efficacy and feasibility have been evaluated through a single arm pre-post observational pilot study settled in Rome. A qualitative phase, consisting of literature analysis of caregivers' unmet needs and a final revision from an experts' group, led to the structuration of the intervention, following the Caregiver Health Engagement Model (CHE-Model). Afterwards, a quantitative phase allowed understanding the feasibility of the intervention through Kruskal-Wallis test on a sample of 47 caregivers.

resultsResults showed a reduction of the physical burden (Chi Squared = 6,483; p = .01) perceived by the caregivers and increase of the health literacy (Chi Squared = 3,560; p = .059) after the intervention.

conclusionsFeasibility tests on caregivers of patients with complex care needs are promising: this pilot study suggests a first effectiveness evidence, particularly concerning aspects related to burden perception and improvements in health literacy. Randomised controlled trials on larger samples are needed.

Indexed as

Chronic DiseaseNeeds AssessmentPersons with DisabilitiesCaregiversCost of IllnessEvaluation Studies as TopicHumansItalyPilot ProjectsSocial SupportBurdenCaregiverEngage-in-caringEngagement

Identifiers

PMID31375099
PMCPMC6679432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.